to be included

USAGE SUMMARY

'to be included' is an acceptable and usable phrase in written English
It can typically be used when you are giving instructions or expressing a desire for something to be accounted for in a particular situation. For example, "All job applicants must provide three references to be included in the review process."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

They wanted to be included".

The New York Times

He wants to be included.

The New Yorker

"Both parties wanted to be included".

The New York Times

It will have to be included.

The Economist

(The food tends to be included).

The New York Times - Food

"It's nice to be included".

The New York Times - Arts

Patients clamored to be included.

The New York Times - Health

Still, everybody wanted to be included.

The New York Times - Arts

Anything missing you'd like to be included?

The Guardian

Well, this just had to be included.

The Guardian

"Now we're just fortunate to be included".

The New York Times - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "to be included", ensure the context clearly indicates what is being included and in what.

Common error

Avoid using "to be included" without specifying what the subject should be included in. This can lead to ambiguity and confusion.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "to be included" typically functions as part of an infinitive clause. It often modifies a noun or pronoun, indicating that something or someone should form a part of a larger whole or consideration. Ludwig AI confirms its wide use across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Science

18%

Formal & Business

7%

Less common in

Academia

3%

Reference

2%

Encyclopedias

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "to be included" functions as an infinitive phrase used to express the necessity or desire for something to be part of a larger set or consideration. Ludwig AI analysis reveals that it's grammatically correct and frequently used across diverse contexts, especially in news, media, and scientific writing. Though versatile, it is essential to ensure clarity by specifying what is being included and in what. Alternatives like "to be involved" or "to be considered" may offer more nuanced meanings depending on the context. The phrase's neutral register makes it appropriate for both formal and informal communication. Its high frequency and consistent usage in authoritative sources underscore its reliability in written English.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

to be involved

Focuses on active participation rather than simply being listed or accounted for.

to be considered

Emphasizes the act of being taken into account, often in decision-making processes.

to be incorporated

Highlights the integration of something into a larger whole.

to be integrated

Similar to 'incorporated' but often implies a more seamless or essential merging.

to be admitted

Suggests being allowed entry or acceptance into a group or situation.

to be comprised

Indicates being a part of a composition or whole.

to be encompassed

Implies being fully covered or contained within something else.

to be comprised of

Specifies the elements that constitute a whole.

to be featured

Suggests being prominently displayed or highlighted.

to be listed

Focuses on the act of being placed on a list or register.

FAQs

How can I use "to be included" in a sentence?

You can use "to be included" to indicate that something should be part of a larger group, list, or consideration. For example, "All relevant data needs "to be included" in the report".

What's an alternative to "to be included"?

Alternatives include "to be involved", "to be considered", or "to be incorporated", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "needs to be include" instead of "needs to be included"?

No, "needs to be include" is grammatically incorrect. The correct phrasing is "needs "to be included"", as it uses the past participle form of the verb.

How does "to be included" differ from "to be considered"?

"To be included" generally means to be part of a list or group, while ""to be considered"" suggests that something should be taken into account during a decision-making process. They are not always interchangeable.