to be fought

USAGE SUMMARY

"to be fought" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is usually used to refer to struggles, battles, wars, or conflicts that must be overcome or endured. For example: "This disease will be a difficult battle to be fought, but with courage and resilience, we can win."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It had to be fought and won..

The New York Times - Books

There's bigger battles to be fought yet".

The Guardian - Sport

Games tend to be fought tenaciously.

The New York Times - Travel

It has to be fought for.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Demagogic nationalism has to be fought.

The Guardian - Opinion

Terrorists have to be fought with guns.

The Guardian - Opinion

Something to be fought and won.

The Guardian - Opinion

They're something that has to be fought for.

Yale University

Unfortunately, they need to be fought at several levels.

The New York Times

Every inch forward has to be fought for".

The New York Times

But the final battle has yet to be fought.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "to be fought" to convey the necessity of confronting challenges, whether in abstract concepts or concrete situations. For example, "Prejudice is a mindset that has to be fought."

Common error

Avoid using "to be fought" when an active voice would be more direct and impactful. For example, instead of "The bill has to be fought by us", use "We must fight the bill."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "to be fought" functions as an infinitive phrase used in the passive voice. It indicates that an action (fighting) needs to be carried out, typically against an opposing force or challenge. Ludwig shows examples where it emphasizes the necessity or inevitability of conflict.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

67%

Academia

19%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Science

3%

Wiki

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "to be fought" is a versatile and grammatically correct construction used to express the necessity of confronting a challenge or opposition. As evidenced by Ludwig's extensive examples, it's very common, appearing most frequently in news and media contexts but also holding relevance in academia. While grammatically sound, avoid using it in situations where an active voice would be more impactful. According to Ludwig AI, understanding the nuances of "to be fought" can enhance your writing by allowing you to convey a sense of required action and resistance in a clear and effective manner.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

to be contended with

Emphasizes the aspect of dealing with a challenging situation or opponent.

to be resisted

Focuses on the act of opposing or preventing something from happening.

to be combated

Implies a more direct and forceful effort to overcome something.

to be challenged

Highlights the act of questioning or disputing something.

to be tackled

Suggests a proactive approach to dealing with a problem or issue.

to be opposed

Focuses on the act of being against something.

to be confronted

Highlights the act of facing a difficult situation or person.

to be addressed

Emphasizes the importance of dealing with an issue or problem.

to be overcome

Focuses on the act of successfully dealing with a challenge.

to be suppressed

Implies the act of forcefully preventing something from happening or being expressed.

FAQs

How can I use "to be fought" in a sentence?

The phrase "to be fought" is used to express that something needs to be struggled against or resisted. For example, "Injustice is a battle "to be fought" by all."

What are some alternatives to "to be fought"?

Alternatives to "to be fought" include phrases like "to be contended with", "to be resisted", or "to be challenged", depending on the nuance you wish to convey.

Is it correct to say "a war to be fought"?

Yes, "a war to be fought" is grammatically correct and commonly used to describe a conflict that needs to be engaged in. It emphasizes the necessity of the conflict.

What's the difference between "to be fought" and "to fight"?

"To be fought" is in the passive voice, indicating something needs to be struggled against. "To fight" is active, meaning someone is actively engaging in a struggle. For example, "The system is "to be fought"" versus "We must "to fight" the system".