Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

to be experienced

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'to be experienced' is correct and can be used in written English.
This phrase typically implies that something is expected or necessary to gain knowledge, insight, or a sense of something. For example: "The beauty of nature is something that needs to be experienced in person."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

It needs to be experienced.

News & Media

Independent

It was meant to be experienced.

News & Media

The New Yorker

It just asks to be experienced.

News & Media

The New Yorker

It has to be experienced".

News & Media

The New York Times

The other twin has to be experienced.

It was meant to be experienced..

News & Media

The New Yorker

Course they want you to be experienced too.

News & Media

The New Yorker

It's a story that needs to be experienced firsthand.

News & Media

The New Yorker

The hostility of the hotel workers was to be experienced.

That it's meant to be experienced out in the street.

News & Media

The New York Times

But tackiness on this level cries out to be experienced.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "to be experienced" when emphasizing that understanding or appreciating something requires direct personal involvement, rather than simply reading or hearing about it.

Common error

Avoid overusing "to be experienced" in sentences where active voice would be more direct and engaging. For example, instead of "The exhibit is to be experienced", try "Experience the exhibit."

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

91%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "to be experienced" primarily functions as a verbal phrase within infinitive clauses. It signifies that something requires direct personal involvement or sensory engagement for complete understanding or appreciation. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Science

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

1%

Academia

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "to be experienced" is a grammatically sound and widely used expression that emphasizes the necessity of direct, personal involvement for a complete understanding or appreciation. As Ludwig AI has confirmed, the phrase is considered correct. Predominantly found in news and media contexts, it maintains a neutral register suitable for various settings. Related phrases such as "to need experiencing" offer semantically similar alternatives. Remember to use it to highlight the importance of firsthand engagement, and be mindful of overusing passive voice for a more direct writing style. The prevalence of this phrase across authoritative sources underscores its reliability and versatility.

FAQs

How can I use "to be experienced" in a sentence?

Use "to be experienced" to emphasize the necessity of direct, personal involvement for complete understanding or appreciation. For example, "The true beauty of the rainforest has "to be experienced" firsthand."

What can I say instead of "to be experienced"?

You can use alternatives like "to need experiencing", "to require experiencing", or "to demand immersion" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "must be experienced" or "needs to be experienced"?

"Must be experienced" conveys a stronger sense of obligation or necessity, while "needs to be experienced" indicates a requirement for understanding or appreciation. The best choice depends on the intended emphasis.

Which is correct, "something to experience" or "something to be experienced"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct, but they have slightly different meanings. "Something to experience" implies an opportunity or suggestion, while "something to be experienced" emphasizes the necessity or importance of the experience.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

91%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: