Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
to be equivalent
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "to be equivalent" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the equality or similarity of two or more things in terms of value, meaning, or function. Example: "In mathematics, two expressions can be simplified to be equivalent, meaning they yield the same result."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Academia
Alternative expressions(7)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Such hydrogens are said to be equivalent.
Encyclopedias
Fluids were believed to be equivalent to performance-enhancing drugs.
News & Media
The workload is designed to be equivalent to a class.
Academia
It's going to be equivalent of a LEED silver rating.
News & Media
All the constraints are shown to be equivalent to LMIs.
Science
The transformations wrought by the digital revolution look likely to be equivalent in magnitude.
News & Media
"What women need is to be able to be equivalent, rather than equal.
News & Media
The cartridges, which are supposed to be equivalent to 12 fags, run out at alarming speed.
News & Media
Salaries tend to be equivalent to traditional communications roles, in the region of £20-30K.
News & Media
I say, do I want my book in anyone's mind to be equivalent to a porno?
News & Media
The 20% target is now so weak as to be equivalent to business as usual.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "to be equivalent", ensure that the context clearly defines the criteria for equivalence. Specify the aspect in which the items or concepts are considered equivalent to avoid ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid using "to be equivalent" when only a partial or approximate similarity exists. Using weaker terms like "similar" or "comparable" is more appropriate when the subjects aren't perfectly interchangeable.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "to be equivalent" primarily functions as a predicate adjective phrase. It modifies a noun or pronoun to describe its state of being equal or virtually equal to something else. Ludwig confirms its correctness and widespread usage.
Frequent in
Science
46%
News & Media
28%
Academia
16%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
4%
Wiki
2%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "to be equivalent" is a versatile phrase used to express a state of equality or near-equality between two or more entities. According to Ludwig, the phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used. Its applicability spans across diverse fields, including science, news, and academia. When employing the phrase, it's essential to ensure the context clarifies the specific criteria for equivalence to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives such as "to be equal" or "to be the same as" may be more appropriate depending on the nuances you wish to convey. By understanding these subtleties, you can use "to be equivalent" effectively in your writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
to be identical to
This alternative signifies complete agreement or correspondence in every detail.
to be equal
This alternative focuses on the idea of exact sameness in value or measure, slightly emphasizing numerical or quantitative aspects.
to be indistinguishable from
This highlights the inability to perceive any difference between two things, suggesting a high degree of similarity.
to be the same as
This alternative emphasizes identity and lack of difference between two things, highlighting their indistinguishability.
to be interchangeable
This highlights the ability to substitute one thing for another without altering the outcome or meaning.
to be comparable
This option suggests a degree of similarity that allows for comparison, though not necessarily complete equivalence.
to be on par with
This phrase indicates a level of equality in status or quality, often used in competitive contexts.
to be analogous to
This implies a similarity based on a specific point of comparison, suggesting a parallel or likeness in particular aspects.
to be commensurate with
This suggests a proportional relationship or correspondence in measure or degree.
to be uniform with
This emphasizes consistency and lack of variation, suggesting a standardized similarity.
FAQs
What does "to be equivalent" mean?
The phrase "to be equivalent" means that two or more things are equal or virtually equal in value, function, or meaning. It indicates a substantial degree of sameness.
How can I use "to be equivalent" in a sentence?
You can use "to be equivalent" to show that two things have the same effect or value. For example: "For the purposes of this study, these two methods are assumed "to be equivalent"."
What are some alternatives to "to be equivalent"?
Some alternatives to "to be equivalent" include "to be equal", "to be the same as", or "to be comparable", depending on the context and the nuance you want to convey.
When is it appropriate to use "to be equivalent" rather than "to be similar"?
"To be equivalent" implies a stronger degree of sameness than "to be similar". Use "to be equivalent" when the items are practically interchangeable. If there are noticeable differences, "to be similar" is more appropriate.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested