to be edited

USAGE SUMMARY

"to be edited" is not correct and usable in written English.
You cannot use it as a standalone part of a sentence. You could use the phrase "to be edited" as part of a larger sentence or phrase to indicate that something needs to be changed. For example: "This document needs to be edited for accuracy."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It had to be edited.

The New York Times - Magazine

To be edited only by developers.

Stanford University

It's an incredible privilege to be edited by you.

The New Yorker

They are not to be edited or enhanced.

The New York Times

By Thomas Mallon Spark eventually refused to be edited.

The New Yorker

After all, this column has to be edited.

The New York Times

Page description languages portray finished documents, ones that are not intended to be edited.

How to Build a Digital Library

The drummer was interviewed too late to be edited into the current film.

Independent

This is a book that cries out like one of his maudlin ditties to be edited.

Independent

Some of it is quite graphic and might need to be edited.

The New York Times

"So I really do have to be edited a bit to be a convincing action heroine".

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the phrase "to be edited" within a complete sentence to ensure grammatical correctness. For example: "This document needs to be edited."

Common error

Do not use "to be edited" as a standalone phrase. It requires context to be grammatically sound. Instead, provide context by specifying what needs editing and why.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "to be edited" functions as part of a passive infinitive construction, typically indicating an action that needs to be performed on a subject. As Ludwig AI points out, it's generally incorrect as a standalone phrase and requires a complete sentence for proper usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

38%

Science

33%

Wiki

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

8%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "to be edited" is frequently encountered but grammatically incorrect when used alone. Ludwig AI emphasizes the necessity of incorporating it into a complete sentence to convey that something requires modifications. While the phrase appears across various contexts like News & Media and Science, remember to provide a clear subject to ensure proper usage. Alternative phrases such as "subject to editing" or "requires revision" can offer more context. Always avoid using the phrase in isolation to maintain grammatical accuracy.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

subject to editing

Focuses on the possibility or likelihood of future edits.

requires revision

Highlights the necessity of revising the content, emphasizing the need for improvements.

needs to be revised

Specifies an action to be performed, focusing on necessity.

pending review

Highlights that the content is awaiting evaluation before potential changes.

under review

Indicates that the item is currently undergoing scrutiny for potential modifications.

awaiting edits

Emphasizes the anticipation of changes, suggesting a state of readiness for modification.

to be corrected

Focuses specifically on the act of correcting errors.

requires modification

Underscores the need for adjustments or alterations to improve the content.

in need of refinement

Indicates a requirement for subtle improvements and enhancements.

still in draft form

Points out the preliminary nature of the content, implying that changes are expected.

FAQs

How can I use "to be edited" correctly in a sentence?

Use "to be edited" as part of a complete sentence, such as "The report needs "to be edited" before submission".

What are some alternatives to saying "to be edited"?

Alternatives include phrases like "subject to editing", "requires revision", or "needs to be revised" depending on the context.

Is it grammatically correct to use "to be edited" on its own?

No, using "to be edited" as a standalone phrase is generally considered grammatically incorrect. It requires additional context to form a complete thought. Ludwig AI confirms this assessment.

What's the difference between "to be edited" and "under review"?

"To be edited" indicates that something needs changes, while "under review" suggests it's being evaluated for potential changes. The former implies a known need for edits, while the latter suggests an assessment process.