to adjust for differences

USAGE SUMMARY

"to adjust for differences" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used when referring to making changes or modifications in order to account for variations or discrepancies. For example: - In order to create a fair comparison, we need to adjust for differences in income levels between the two groups. - The company had to adjust for differences in cultural norms when expanding into international markets. - The study adjusted for differences in age and gender to ensure accurate results. - The recipe can be adjusted for differences in dietary restrictions by using alternative ingredients. - The team had to adjust for differences in time zones while collaborating on the project.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Risk adjustment attempts to adjust for differences in client populations that may bias the HCQI rates.

BMC Health Services Research

Stratification is typically used to adjust for differences among individual clinical trial centers with different success rates.

Controlled Clinical Trials

But the research tried to adjust for differences in professional status.

The Economist

Results from each of the six surveys were weighted equally to adjust for differences in sample size among the surveys.

Yale University

Filter rules (FRs) for construction accidents and adaptation rules (ARs) to adjust for differences in accidents are formulated.

Expert Systems with Applications

Differences were detected in least squares mean estimates of composite satiety scores and each individual question with statistical modelling to adjust for differences in baseline scores.

Appetite

Craig McKinlay, mortgages director at Halifax, said: "House price per square metre is a useful measure for house price comparison because it helps to adjust for differences in the size and type of properties between locations.

The Guardian - Money

Because the frames on the film of a still camera are roughly twice the size of motion picture frames, technicians have plenty of space to adjust for differences in alignment among the cameras.

The New York Times - Tech

A Cox proportional-hazards model was employed to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics.

Duke University

Multivariable and causal inference analyses were applied to adjust for differences in baseline risk.

Duke University

A previously defined logistic regression model was used to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics and to predict mortality.

Duke University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "to adjust for differences", clearly specify the factors or variables being adjusted. This adds precision and clarity to your writing.

Common error

Avoid making adjustments without explaining the methodology or rationale. Simply stating that you've adjusted for differences isn't sufficient; describe how the adjustment was performed.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "to adjust for differences" functions as an infinitive of purpose. It clarifies the reason or intention behind an action, indicating that something is being done to account for variations. Ludwig provides numerous examples showcasing its use in research and analysis.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

73%

Academia

14%

News & Media

11%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "to adjust for differences" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression, as confirmed by Ludwig. It serves as an infinitive of purpose, explaining the rationale behind an action aimed at accounting for variations. Predominantly found in formal and scientific contexts, such as academic research and data analysis, the phrase emphasizes objectivity and precision. Common synonyms include "to compensate for disparities" and "to account for discrepancies". When using this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying which factors are being adjusted and avoiding oversimplified explanations of the adjustment process.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

to compensate for disparities

Emphasizes making up for inequalities, rather than simply acknowledging differences.

to allow for variations

Focuses on permitting or enabling deviations, subtly different from actively adjusting.

to account for discrepancies

Highlights the act of explaining or justifying inconsistencies.

to correct for biases

Specifically addresses the act of removing or reducing prejudice or skewing factors.

to normalize for variations

Implies bringing data or situations to a standard or average state to remove the impact of variations.

to reconcile differences

Suggests resolving conflicts or disagreements stemming from variations.

to calibrate for deviations

Emphasizes fine-tuning or aligning based on observed departures from a standard.

to even out inequalities

Highlights the act of reducing disparities, focusing on creating a more balanced situation.

to moderate variations

Focuses on lessening the intensity or impact of fluctuations.

to standardize for variations

Implies applying a uniform process to eliminate the impact of variable factors.

FAQs

How can I use "to adjust for differences" in a sentence?

You can use "to adjust for differences" to explain that you're modifying data or procedures to account for variations. For example: "The results were standardized "to adjust for differences" in age and gender."

What are some alternatives to "to adjust for differences"?

Alternatives include "to compensate for disparities", "to account for discrepancies", or "to allow for variations", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

In what contexts is it appropriate to use "to adjust for differences"?

It is suitable in any context where you need to acknowledge and correct or mitigate the impact of variations between data sets, populations, or experimental conditions. This is common in science, statistics, and economics.

What's the difference between "to adjust for differences" and "to control for differences"?

"To control for differences" implies holding certain variables constant or minimizing their impact, while "to adjust for differences" involves actively modifying data or results to account for variations. While similar, "to control for differences" often refers to the experimental design, while "to adjust for differences" often refers to the analysis phase.