timetable was set for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "timetable was set for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to a schedule or plan that has been established for a specific event or activity. Example: "The timetable was set for the project completion by the end of the month."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

10 human-written examples

No timetable was set for negotiations.

The New York Times

No timetable was set for the review.

The New York Times

No timetable was set for the report.

The New York Times

No timetable was set for selling and relocating the home.

The New York Times

Financial terms were not disclosed and no timetable was set for Rouge's emergence from bankruptcy.

The New York Times

No timetable was set for Mr. Philbin's return, but the show will use guest hosts until he comes back.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

43 human-written examples

No timetable is set for a decision.

The New York Times

Nor should a fixed timetable be set, for that would embolden the insurgents.The cost to America of staying in Iraq may be high, but the cost of retreat would be higher.

The Economist

The timetable is set out in statute and the rules for applying for a postal vote in a particular election mesh with this.

The Guardian - Opinion

No specific timetable has been set for the plan.

The New York Times

No timetable has been set for the parishes.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "timetable was set for", ensure that the context clearly indicates what the timetable pertains to. For example, specify "timetable was set for the project" instead of just "timetable was set".

Common error

Avoid using "timetable was set for" without specifying what the timetable is for. Ambiguity can arise if the context is not explicitly stated.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "timetable was set for" functions as a statement indicating that a schedule or plan has been established for a particular event, task, or process. Ludwig confirms that is a correct and usable phrase.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "timetable was set for" is a grammatically correct phrase used to indicate that a schedule or plan has been established. As Ludwig confirms, it is valid and can be used in written English. While the phrase is not very common, it is mostly found in news and media contexts. When using the phrase, remember to specify what the timetable is for to avoid ambiguity. Alternative phrases such as ""schedule was established for"" or ""timeline was arranged for"" can be used to convey similar meanings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

schedule was established for

Replaces "timetable" with "schedule" and "set" with "established" to offer a more formal tone.

timeline was arranged for

Substitutes "timetable" with "timeline" and "set" with "arranged", suggesting a planned sequence of events.

plan was finalized for

Emphasizes the completion of planning by using "finalized" instead of "set".

date was scheduled for

Focuses on a specific date being arranged rather than an entire timetable.

deadline was established for

Highlights the establishment of a deadline instead of a more general timetable.

program was scheduled for

Replaces "timetable" with "program" to indicate a structured set of activities.

framework was established for

Suggests a basic structure or set of guidelines was created.

arrangements were made for

More broadly indicates that preparations or agreements have been completed.

parameters were defined for

Emphasizes the setting of limits or boundaries for a particular activity.

format was determined for

Focuses on the structure or presentation of something.

FAQs

How can I use "timetable was set for" in a sentence?

You can use "timetable was set for" to indicate that a schedule or plan has been established for a specific event or activity. For example, "The "timetable was set for" the completion of the project by the end of the month".

What can I say instead of "timetable was set for"?

Alternatives include "schedule was established for", "timeline was arranged for", or "plan was finalized for" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it more appropriate to use "a timetable was set" or "the timetable was set"?

Use "a timetable was set" when introducing a new schedule. Use "the timetable was set" when referring to a previously mentioned or understood schedule.

Which is correct, "timetable was set for" or "timetable is set for"?

"Timetable was set for" indicates that the schedule has already been established in the past. "Timetable is set for" suggests that the schedule is currently in place or will be established soon.