timed at

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "timed at" is correct and usable in written English.
It is commonly used when describing the amount of time it takes to do something, often in a competitive setting. For example, "He ran the 100m dash in record time, timed at 10.5 seconds."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Thompson was timed at 53.14.

The New York Times - Sports

The goal is timed at 93min 20sec.

The Guardian - Sport

Both men were timed at 3 54.6, Ryun generously so.

The New York Times - Sports

The shocks were timed at one-minute intervals.

The New Yorker

In 2009, Sharapova was timed at 1.5 seconds per shriek.

The New York Times

Montgomery was timed at 6.53 seconds and Saddler at 6.56.

The New York Times - Sports

One second serve there was timed at 89mph.

The Guardian - Sport

Powell was timed at 9.93 and Christophe Lemaitre finished third in 10.00.

The New York Times - Sports

A 6-foot-2 Dutchwoman, Schultz-McCarthy had a first serve once timed at 126 m.p.h.

The New York Times

Deliveries of food and other supplies to the area could be timed at nonpeak hours.

The New York Times

A homing pigeon has been timed at 152 km/hr (94 mph).

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "timed at" to clearly indicate the measurement of time in events or processes. It is often used in sports, scientific studies, and scheduling contexts.

Common error

Avoid using incorrect verb tenses with "timed at". Ensure the tense aligns with the context of when the timing occurred (e.g., "was timed" for past events, "is timed" for present or scheduled events).

Linguistic Context

The phrase "timed at" primarily functions as a verb phrase indicating the measurement of duration or the designation of a specific point in time. As Ludwig indicates, the phrase is considered correct in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

47%

Encyclopedias

12%

Science

12%

Less common in

Wiki

8%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "timed at" is a versatile expression primarily used to denote the measurement of time in various contexts, ranging from athletic events to scheduling. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and widely used across diverse domains, particularly in news, encyclopedias, and scientific publications. While alternatives like "measured at" or "clocked at" exist, the specific choice depends on the nuance you want to convey. Remember to ensure correct tense usage to avoid common errors. Its frequent occurrence in reputable sources solidifies its reliability and appropriateness in various writing styles.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

measured at

Focuses on the act of measuring rather than scheduling or coordinating.

clocked at

Implies a more informal or rapid measurement of time, often in sports contexts.

scheduled for

Shifts the meaning to indicate a prearranged time for an event.

set at

Suggests a predetermined setting of time or a limit.

coordinated for

Indicates that something is organized to happen at a specific time.

arranged for

Similar to scheduled, but slightly less formal, implying an agreement on timing.

calculated at

Emphasizes the process of calculating a time or duration.

estimated for

Highlights that the time is an approximation rather than an exact measurement.

expected at

Focuses on anticipating an event at a certain time.

planned for

Implies a more detailed plan involving timing.

FAQs

How can I use "timed at" in a sentence?

Use "timed at" to indicate the duration or point in time when something occurred, especially in performance measurements or scheduled events. For example, "The race was timed at 10 seconds".

What are some alternatives to using "timed at"?

You can use alternatives like "measured at", "clocked at", or "scheduled for" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "the event is timed at 2 pm" or "the event is scheduled at 2 pm"?

Both are correct, but they have slightly different meanings. "Timed at" implies a measurement of duration, while "scheduled for" indicates a planned start time.

What's the difference between "timed at" and "estimated at"?

"Timed at" implies an accurate measurement of time, while "estimated at" suggests an approximate or projected time.