Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

this was supported by

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "this was supported by" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to evidence or information that backs up a statement or claim made earlier in the text. Example: "The findings of the study were significant, and this was supported by the data collected over the past year."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Worse, this was supported by less capital.

This was supported by subjective feedback.

This was supported by four curved legs, ornamented with scrolls.

Encyclopedias

Britannica

This was supported by transient two-dimensional heat transfer simulations.

This was supported by the suppression of toxicity by exogenous superoxide dismutase.

This was supported by gene ontology analysis using DAVID27 (Supplementary Table 1).

Science & Research

Nature

This was supported by the peak expression of chi2, galactomannan at this stage.

Science & Research

Nature

This was supported by increased Hemiptera species richness at high PSD and PGD.

This was supported by a similarity in measured erosion angular erosion distribution with cylindrical samples.

Science

Wear

This was supported by the results of the inorganic carbon concentrations on the two powders.

This was supported by environmental groups.

News & Media

BBC
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "this was supported by", ensure that the 'this' clearly refers to a specific claim or statement in the preceding text to maintain clarity and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "this was supported by" when the 'this' lacks a clear referent. Ensure the connection between 'this' and the supported idea is explicit to prevent misinterpretation.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "this was supported by" functions as a transitional phrase to introduce evidence, data, or reasoning that validates or confirms a prior statement or claim. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase's common usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

70%

News & Media

13%

Encyclopedias

2%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "this was supported by" is a commonly used transitional phrase that introduces supporting evidence for a preceding statement. Ludwig AI affirms its correct grammatical structure and frequent usage across diverse domains, particularly in scientific literature, news articles, and encyclopedic entries. Alternatives such as "this was corroborated by" or "this is evidenced by" can be used to convey similar meanings, depending on the nuance you wish to express. When using "this was supported by", ensure that the 'this' clearly refers to a specific idea to avoid ambiguity and to maintain writing clarity. Understanding its function and appropriate contexts ensures more effective and persuasive communication.

FAQs

How to use "this was supported by" in a sentence?

Use "this was supported by" to introduce evidence or reasoning that validates a previous statement. For example, "The hypothesis was confirmed, and "this was supported by" extensive experimental data".

What can I say instead of "this was supported by"?

You can use alternatives like "this was corroborated by", "this was validated by", or "this is evidenced by" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "this was supported by" or "this is supported by"?

Both are grammatically correct, but their use depends on the context. "This was supported by" implies that the support occurred in the past, while "this is supported by" indicates current support.

What's the difference between "this was supported by" and "this was fueled by"?

"This was supported by" indicates endorsement or validation, whereas "this was fueled by" implies that something was driven or intensified by a particular factor.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: