this was reported

USAGE SUMMARY

"This was reported" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe a statement or action that has been reported in some type of media or communication. For example: According to the news report, this was reported as an act of vandalism.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This was reported as: "Let Muslim primary school teachers wear full-face veil in class, says former archbishop of Canterbury".

The Guardian - Opinion

This was reported as events per 10,000 person-years with a 95% confidence interval.

Injury Epidemiology

This was reported to the pilot, Capt.

The New York Times

This was reported to the Court in February 1939.

Cornell University

"This was reported on US television in 1967," says Oppenheimer.

The Guardian - Film

This was reported by an investigator named Mintzberg in 1973.

The Guardian

This was reported to amount to a 2.5% cut.

The Guardian - Business

This was reported as a snub in Japan's tabloid press.

The New York Times

This was reported as fact by some media outlets, but it was later retracted as wrong.

The Guardian

This was reported yesterday by The Guardian (here) and The Independent (here).

The Guardian

Oddly, this was reported as if it were a lot of money.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "this was reported" to introduce information that might be surprising or contested, signaling to the reader that the information comes from an external source.

Common error

While "this was reported" is grammatically correct, excessive use of passive voice can make your writing sound vague and less engaging. Consider active voice alternatives when appropriate for a more direct style.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "this was reported" serves as a reporting clause, introducing information attributed to an external source. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread use in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

35%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Wiki

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "this was reported" is a versatile phrase used to introduce information derived from external sources. Ludwig AI affirms its grammatical correctness and common usage across diverse fields like news, science, and academia. While effective, it's important to balance passive reporting with active voice for engaging writing. Remember to cite credible sources when using "this was reported" to enhance the reliability of your statements. Consider alternatives like "it was mentioned" or "sources say" to vary your writing style. By following these guidelines, you can effectively integrate "this was reported" into your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it was mentioned

Replaces "reported" with "mentioned", softening the emphasis on formal reporting.

it has been noted

Emphasizes observation and documentation rather than formal reporting.

it was announced

Suggests a formal declaration or public statement.

it was indicated

Implies a more subtle communication or sign.

it was stated

Highlights the act of making a formal statement.

it was revealed

Indicates the uncovering of previously unknown information.

it came to light

Suggests the information became public or known.

sources say

Attribution of information to unnamed sources.

reports suggest

Indicates that the information is based on multiple reports.

the findings showed

Common in scientific and research contexts, highlighting study results.

FAQs

How can I use "this was reported" in a sentence?

You can use "this was reported" to introduce information from a specific source. For instance, "This was reported in The New York Times as a significant economic downturn".

What are some alternatives to saying "this was reported"?

Alternatives include phrases like "it was mentioned", "it was announced", or "sources say", depending on the context and the level of formality.

Is it better to use active or passive voice when reporting information?

While "this was reported" (passive voice) is acceptable, using active voice can sometimes make your writing more direct and engaging. For example, instead of "This was reported", you could say "The New York Times reported this".

When should I use "this was reported" instead of naming the source directly?

Use "this was reported" when the source is less important than the fact itself, or when you want to maintain a neutral tone. However, naming the source directly often adds more credibility.