this was due to

USAGE SUMMARY

"this was due to" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it whenever you want to explain the cause of something. For example, "The delays in the project were significant, this was due to the shortage of resources."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This was due to a natural likability.

The Guardian

In part, this was due to the weather.

The New York Times - Travel

Some of this was due to the Republican election tide.

The New York Times

All of this was due to the warm fall season.

The New York Times

Perhaps this was due to bad video editing.

The Guardian - Opinion

Part of this was due to nothing more than snobbery.

The Guardian - Sport

This was due to a plan executed and followed through.

The New Yorker

This was due to end soon, and delivery would follow.

The New Yorker

Part of this was due to social change.

The Guardian

This was due to the latter not broadcasting its position.

The Guardian

We propose this was due to several factors.

Harvard University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "this was due to", ensure the connection between the cause and effect is clear and logical to maintain the clarity of your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "this was due to" when describing correlations that are not directly causal. Ensure a clear cause-and-effect relationship, rather than merely an association.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "this was due to" functions as a causal connector, linking an outcome or situation to its cause. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is used to explain the reason behind something. The examples from Ludwig demonstrate its use across various domains.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

30%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

2%

Formal & Business

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "this was due to" serves as a straightforward method for indicating causation in both written and spoken English. Ludwig AI affirms its correctness and broad applicability. As seen in the Ludwig examples, this phrase is commonly used across diverse fields, including science, news, and academia. While its usage is generally neutral to formal, it's essential to ensure a genuine cause-and-effect relationship to prevent misinterpretations. Consider alternatives like "this resulted from" or "this was a consequence of" for nuanced expression. Remembering to ensure clear causation when using "this was due to" will maintain writing clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

this resulted from

Replaces the wording to focus on the outcome stemming from a cause.

this was a consequence of

Emphasizes the idea of a direct result or effect.

this stemmed from

Indicates that something originated or arose from a specific source.

this arose from

Suggests the beginning or emergence of something as a result.

the reason for this was

Directly states that a reason will be provided.

this can be attributed to

Highlights the act of assigning a cause or origin to something.

this was caused by

A more direct and active way of stating causation.

the explanation for this is

Signals that an explanation is about to be given.

this is attributable to

States that something can be linked or credited to a specific cause.

this is a result of

Focuses on the outcome as being directly produced by something else.

FAQs

How can I use "this was due to" in a sentence?

Use "this was due to" to explain the reason or cause behind a particular event or situation. For example, "The project's delay "this was due to" unforeseen circumstances".

What can I say instead of "this was due to"?

You can use alternatives like "this resulted from", "this was a consequence of", or "this stemmed from" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "this is due to" instead of "this was due to"?

Yes, both "this is due to" and "this was due to" are grammatically correct, but they are used in different tenses. "This is due to" is used to describe a current or future cause, while "this was due to" describes a past cause.

What is the difference between "this was due to" and "this was because of"?

While both phrases indicate causation, "this was due to" often implies a more direct or immediate cause, whereas "this was because of" can refer to a broader or more complex set of reasons.