this was considered

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "this was considered" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a decision-making process or evaluating an idea or proposal in the past. Example: "During the meeting, this was considered a viable option for the project moving forward."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This was considered normal.

The Guardian

This was considered inadequate, however.

Encyclopedia Britannica

This was considered outrageous at the time.

Yale University

Within the administration, this was considered provocative.

University of California, Berkeley

The probability of this was considered small.

The New York Times

This was considered more a harassment case.

The Washington Post

This was considered a good thing.

The New York Times

"This was considered major rebellion," he said.

The New York Times

This was considered an important work.

The Guardian - Books

This was considered an important historical work.

The Guardian - Books

This was considered a step forward.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "this was considered" to introduce an idea, decision, or evaluation that occurred in the past, providing background or context for further discussion.

Common error

Avoid using "this was considered" without specifying who considered it. Vague attributions weaken your writing. Instead, clarify by stating, "The committee considered..." or "Experts considered...".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "this was considered" functions as a passive construction used to indicate that a subject was evaluated or contemplated by an unspecified or previously mentioned agent. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

33%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

1%

Formal & Business

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "this was considered" is a versatile phrase used to indicate that something was evaluated or contemplated in the past. Ludwig AI analysis indicates that it is grammatically correct and widely used across various domains, including news, science, and academia. While alternatives like "this was deemed" or "this was regarded as" exist, the choice depends on the desired nuance. When using this phrase, ensure clear attribution and avoid vague references to maintain clarity and strength in your writing. Ludwig highlights its common usage and acceptability.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

it was deemed

Replaces "considered" with "deemed", suggesting a formal judgment or assessment.

it was regarded as

Uses "regarded as" instead of "considered", implying a general opinion or view.

it was viewed as

Substitutes "viewed as" for "considered", focusing on a particular perspective or viewpoint.

it was thought to be

Employs "thought to be" in place of "considered", indicating a belief or assumption.

it was understood as

Replaces "considered" with "understood as", highlighting a shared comprehension or interpretation.

it was recognized as

Uses "recognized as" instead of "considered", suggesting an acknowledgment or acceptance of something.

it was accepted as

Substitutes "accepted as" for "considered", implying agreement or consent.

it was judged to be

Employs "judged to be" in place of "considered", indicating a formal evaluation or decision.

it was estimated as

Replaces "considered" with "estimated as", focusing on a calculated or approximate value.

the assessment was

This alternative changes the entire construction of the sentence in order to provide variety in wording

FAQs

How can I use "this was considered" in a sentence?

You can use "this was considered" to describe a past evaluation or decision. For example, "During the project review, "this was considered" a viable solution."

What are some alternatives to "this was considered"?

Alternatives include "this was deemed", "this was regarded as", or "this was viewed as". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "this was considered by" grammatically correct?

Yes, "this was considered by" is grammatically correct. It explicitly indicates who performed the consideration. For instance, "This proposal was considered by the board of directors."

What's the difference between "this was considered" and "this is considered"?

"This was considered" refers to a past action or evaluation, while "this is considered" refers to a current or ongoing perception. For example, "This was considered acceptable last year" (past) versus "This is considered acceptable today" (present).