they were validated

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "they were validated" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to the confirmation or approval of something, such as data, opinions, or actions. Example: "After thorough review, they were validated as accurate and reliable sources for the research."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

35 human-written examples

They were validated by experimental results presented in Part 1 of this paper.

Construction and Building Materials

They were validated with comparative data recorded on vehicles during a measurement campaign on open roads.

Mechatronics

For primers evaluation and titration they were validated regarding the amplification and not with the fluorophore chosen 1 ng μL− 1 of the T. cruzi DNA as target.

Parasitology International

They were validated using wheel tracking results of AC-25 recycled hot mix asphalt and AC-20 mixtures under water immersion, and could thus be used for quick rutting prediction and mixture optimization.

Construction and Building Materials

Regarding their original geometry and some possible design variations, the models were submitted to compression conditions to calculate the maximum compression force and they were validated for comparison with experimental predictions.

Nuclear Engineering and Design

His strategies, such as importing horses from overseas and selecting and breeding horses for stamina over speed, are the exception in American racing and they were validated after the Derby triumph.

The New York Times - Sports

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

25 human-written examples

The baby got to the hospital, and they started all over again, doing what we had already done, like they were validating us.

BMC Health Services Research

These data are being released as they are validated.

Harvard University

New offerings don't get a significant budget until they're validated by users.

Harvard Business Review

Because science is a collective enterprise, our stories will succeed when they are validated by broad agreement in our community.

The Guardian - Opinion

These analytical methods are reviewed briefly in this paper and they are validated with test results.

Composite Structures

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "they were validated", ensure that the subject (they) is clearly defined and that the context provides a clear understanding of what was being validated and by whom or what standard.

Common error

Avoid assuming that validation is universally accepted. Always provide context regarding the methods or criteria used for validation to prevent misinterpretations of the "they were validated" result.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "they were validated" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that a subject (they) has undergone a process of validation. This means that their accuracy, truth, or effectiveness has been confirmed. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is a standard English phrase. Examples show use in scientific and general contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

73%

News & Media

15%

Academia

6%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Wiki

2%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "they were validated" is a commonly used and grammatically correct passive construction to indicate that a subject has been confirmed or proven accurate through a validation process. According to Ludwig AI, its usage is acceptable in English writing. Predominantly found in scientific and news contexts, the phrase conveys credibility and trustworthiness. When employing this phrase, it's crucial to define the subject clearly and provide context regarding the validation methods. Alternatives such as "they were confirmed" or "they were verified" can be used to express similar meanings, depending on the nuances intended.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

they were confirmed

Replaces "validated" with "confirmed", indicating verification of truth or accuracy.

they were verified

Substitutes "validated" with "verified", suggesting that something has been checked for accuracy.

they were authenticated

Uses "authenticated" instead of "validated", implying that something's genuineness has been proven.

they were substantiated

Replaces "validated" with "substantiated", indicating proof with evidence.

they were corroborated

Uses "corroborated" instead of "validated", meaning to confirm or support with additional evidence.

they were proven

Replaces "validated" with "proven", indicating something has been demonstrated to be true.

they were ratified

Substitutes "validated" with "ratified", suggesting formal approval or sanction.

they were endorsed

Uses "endorsed" instead of "validated", meaning to give support or approval to something.

they were certified

Replaces "validated" with "certified", indicating that something has met certain standards.

their accuracy was checked

Changes the sentence structure to actively highlight the checking of accuracy, instead of focusing on the validation itself.

FAQs

How can I use "they were validated" in a sentence?

Use "they were validated" to indicate that something has been confirmed or proven accurate. For instance, "The research findings underwent rigorous testing; as a result, "they were validated" by an independent review board".

What is a good alternative to "they were validated"?

Alternatives include phrases like "they were confirmed", "they were verified", or "they were authenticated", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

What does it mean when something is described as "they were validated"?

It signifies that something, such as data, a theory, or a method, has been assessed and confirmed to meet a certain standard of accuracy, reliability, or effectiveness. It implies that "they were validated" through a specific process or set of criteria.

Is it better to use active or passive voice when describing validation?

Using active voice, such as "the researchers validated the results", is often more direct and clearer. However, passive voice ("they were validated") can be useful when the validator is less important than the fact of validation itself or is already understood in context.