Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
they were included
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase 'they were included' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to refer to the inclusion of something or someone in a group or set. For example: "The names of the participants were listed in the program and they were included in the draw for the special prize."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Encyclopedias
Alternative expressions(20)
they were added
they were incorporated
they were listed
they were involved
they were integrated
they were comprised
they were present
they were concluded
they were misunderstood
they were contained
they were reintroduced
they were list
they were necessitated
they were introduced
they were consisted
they were also
they were put
they were placed
they were brought
they included
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
They were included again in the Whitney Biennial in 1991.
News & Media
Subsequently, they were included in the Book of Concord (1580).
Encyclopedias
If they were included, the contrast would be even sharper.
News & Media
Dresses, when they were included, were short, boxy and with sheer panelling.
News & Media
I keep these pictures only because they were included in the price.
News & Media
Some proposed cuts faced opposition even before they were included in the president's budget.
News & Media
Sony produced the albums free, and they were included in gift packets at hospitals.
News & Media
They were included in the £695 you paid to fly to Prague during the school holidays.
News & Media
"If they were included and recognised as a regional leader, they would temper their ambitions.
News & Media
If they were included, he said, the job-growth statistics would be more impressive.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
1 human-written examples
It was essential that they were included in the process.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "they were included", ensure the context clearly defines who or what "they" refers to. Ambiguity can confuse the reader.
Common error
Avoid using "they were included" when the antecedent is not explicitly stated or easily inferred from the surrounding text. Always make sure it's clear who or what "they" refers to.
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "they were included" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that the subject ("they") underwent the action of being included. As supported by Ludwig, the phrase is grammatically correct and usable in various contexts.
Frequent in
News & Media
31%
Science
57%
Encyclopedias
3%
Less common in
Wiki
1%
Formal & Business
0%
Academia
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "they were included" is a grammatically sound and commonly used passive voice phrase that indicates the incorporation of certain entities into a group or list. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is versatile and suitable for various writing contexts. Its usage spans across diverse fields, including news, science, and encyclopedic content. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by explicitly defining the referent of "they". The phrase's frequency and authoritative sources highlight its reliability, making it a valuable tool for conveying information accurately and effectively.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
they were incorporated
Highlights the act of formally integrating something into a larger structure.
they were listed
Specifically refers to being part of a written or spoken enumeration.
they were integrated
Indicates a process of combining elements into a unified whole.
they were comprised
Focuses on the composition of a group, rather than direct inclusion.
they were featured
Highlights a prominent display or inclusion in a particular context.
they were added
Emphasizes the action of appending or summing up to existing items.
they were encompassed
Suggests being completely surrounded or included within a larger scope.
they were counted
Focuses on the act of being tallied or numbered within a group.
they were involved
Implies participation or engagement in an activity or group.
they were present
Indicates mere presence or existence within a specific context.
FAQs
How can I use "they were included" in a sentence?
Use "they were included" to indicate that certain items or people were part of a group or list. For example, "All applicants who met the criteria were considered, and "they were included" in the final selection process".
What are some alternatives to "they were included"?
Alternatives include "they were added", "they were incorporated", or "they were listed". The best choice depends on the specific context.
Is "they were included" formal or informal?
"They were included" is suitable for both formal and informal contexts. Its neutrality makes it versatile for various types of writing.
What is the difference between "they were included" and "they were involved"?
"They were included" suggests being part of a defined set or list, while "they were involved" implies participation in an activity or process. For example, names "they were included" in the document, and members "they were involved" in the project.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested