Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
they were colossal
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "they were colossal" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that is extremely large or impressive, often in a figurative sense. Example: "The ancient statues they discovered were colossal, towering over the landscape and leaving visitors in awe."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Alternative expressions(20)
they were hefty
they were mammoth
they were huge
they were substantial
they were vast
they were tremendous
they were gigantic
they were large
they were dramatic
they were phenomenal
they were big
they were monumental
they were remarkable
they were enormous
they were significant contributors to growth in past decades
they were great
they were immense
they were significant
they were huge steaks
they were massive
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
2 human-written examples
They were colossal".
News & Media
They were colossal failures of judgment — and judgment is what we look for in a President".
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
58 human-written examples
Because they are colossal and colossally self-important said self-important saidch to make the talent look ridiculouselfven with that tregardin the case—the Heat have, in the Bieber-Sheedoesnternet sense of the word, haters.
News & Media
They are colossal musicians and playing with them was like getting into a big, very fast car and then breaking the speed limit.
News & Media
They're colossal – sometimes magnificent – and they are growing ever bigger and more numerous in the Anthropocene, as humans carry out the greatest ever urban migration.
News & Media
But when you stand next to them in the maintenance shop, they are colossal, as tall as a four- or five-story building.
News & Media
So were colossal miscalculations.
News & Media
And some of the flops were colossal.
News & Media
Those were colossal shoes to fill.
News & Media
These were colossal achievements in which constancy and imagination coalesced.
News & Media
The mammalian die-offs were colossal.
Science & Research
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "they were colossal" when you want to emphasize not only great size but also impressiveness and significance. Consider context to ensure it's the most fitting descriptor.
Common error
Avoid using "they were colossal" in very casual conversations. Simpler terms like "big" or "huge" may be more appropriate in informal settings.
Source & Trust
94%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "they were colossal" functions as a descriptive phrase, attributing the quality of being extremely large and impressive to the subject. Ludwig examples show its use in describing failures, musicians, and buildings.
Frequent in
News & Media
100%
Less common in
Science
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Academia
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "they were colossal" is a grammatically sound and impactful way to describe something of immense size or significance. Ludwig's AI analysis indicates its correctness and notes its use in various contexts, mainly within news and media. While versatile, it's best suited for situations where emphasizing scale and impressiveness are key. When it comes to alternative phrases, consider "they were enormous" or "they were gigantic" for similar effect.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
they were enormous
Replaces "colossal" with a more common synonym, emphasizing size.
they were gigantic
Similar to "enormous", but suggests an even greater size.
they were immense
Focuses on the scale and impressiveness.
they were huge
A simpler, more direct way to describe large size.
they were massive
Emphasizes weight and solidity in addition to size.
they were monumental
Highlights the lasting importance and impressiveness, not just size.
they were tremendous
Conveys a sense of overwhelming scale or impact.
they were prodigious
Implies something extraordinary or remarkable in its size or extent.
they were stupendous
Highlights the astonishing or awe-inspiring nature.
their scale was colossal
Shifts the focus to the scale as being colossal.
FAQs
How can I use "they were colossal" in a sentence?
Use "they were colossal" to describe something impressively large or significant, for example, "The statues "they were colossal" and dominated the landscape."
What are some alternatives to "they were colossal"?
Alternatives include "they were enormous", "they were gigantic", or "they were immense", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is "they were colossal" formal or informal?
"They were colossal" is generally considered neutral to slightly formal. It is suitable for news reports and descriptive writing, but might sound overly dramatic in very casual conversation.
What's the difference between "they were colossal" and "they were huge"?
"They were huge" is a simple statement of size. "They were colossal" implies not only size but also impressiveness, importance, or impact. "They were huge" is more commonly used in everyday language, while "they were colossal" is reserved for things of great significance.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
94%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested