they were also

USAGE SUMMARY

"They were also" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are referring to something previously mentioned in the sentence. For example: "The firemen were brave; they were also very skilled."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

They were also tough.

Independent

They were also problematic.

The New York Times

They were also killers.

The New York Times

They were also clean.

The Economist

They were also fearless.

The New York Times

They were also enormous.

The New York Times - Arts

They were also slow.

Encyclopedia Britannica

They were also true.

The New Yorker

They were also witnesses.

The New York Times

They were also lawbreakers.

The New York Times

They were also cheap.

University of California, Berkeley

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Ensure the context makes it clear who "they" refers to, avoiding ambiguity in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "they were also" without a clear reference to who or what "they" represents in the sentence. Ambiguity can confuse readers; ensure the antecedent is unmistakable.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "they were also" functions as a conjunctive adverbial phrase. It introduces additional information about subjects that have already been mentioned, adding another layer of description or action. As Ludwig AI confirms, this usage is grammatically correct and frequently encountered.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

78%

Academia

12%

Science

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Formal & Business

1%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "they were also" serves as a valuable tool for adding information in various contexts. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness, and its frequent appearance in sources like The New York Times, The New Yorker, and The Economist underscores its widespread acceptance. Remember to use it after clearly identifying the "they" to maintain clarity. Consider alternatives like "in addition, they were" or "furthermore, they were" for nuanced expression. Be mindful about the register; while generally neutral, a more formal option might be preferable in certain scenarios.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

in addition, they were

Emphasizes a direct addition of information.

furthermore, they were

Suggests a more formal continuation of a thought.

moreover, they were

Similar to 'furthermore', but slightly more emphatic.

they additionally were

Highlights the additional nature of the information.

as well, they were

A more casual way to add information.

too, they were

A concise way to indicate inclusion.

they equally were

Indicates parity or similarity in the added information.

they, similarly, were

Draws a parallel between the existing and added information.

on top of that, they were

Emphasizes that the information is added to existing details.

besides this, they were

Indicates that the information is supplementary.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "they were also" in a sentence?

Use "they were also" to add another detail about a previously mentioned subject. For example, "The students were diligent; "they were also" creative."

What are some alternatives to using "they were also"?

You can use phrases like "in addition, they were", "furthermore, they were", or "moreover, they were" to achieve a similar effect.

Is "they were also" formal or informal?

"They were also" is generally considered neutral and can be used in both formal and informal contexts. However, more formal alternatives like "furthermore, they were" might be preferred in strictly formal writing.

Can "they were also" be used at the beginning of a sentence?

While grammatically possible, it's more common and clearer to place "they were also" after the subject to which "they" refers. Starting a sentence this way can sometimes create confusion.