Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

there were more

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "there were more" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that a greater quantity or number of something exists beyond what has already been mentioned. Example: "At the event, there were more attendees than we had anticipated, which made it a great success."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

There were more cheers.

News & Media

The New Yorker

There were more tests.

News & Media

Independent

There were more delays.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Yes, there were more.

There were more explosions.

News & Media

The New York Times

There were more demonstrations.

News & Media

The New Yorker

There were more.

News & Media

The New Yorker

There were more disappointments.

There were more changes inside.

News & Media

The New York Times

There were more important issues.

News & Media

The New York Times

There were more serious responses.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "there were more", ensure the context clearly indicates what is being added or increased. Provide specific details to enhance clarity and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "there were more" with singular nouns. This phrase is designed for plural nouns or uncountable nouns implying quantity. For example, instead of saying "There were more problem", say "There was more trouble" or "There were more problems".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

94%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "there were more" primarily functions as an existential quantifier, indicating the existence of a greater quantity or number of something. As Ludwig AI indicates, it is grammatically correct and frequently used. The numerous examples demonstrate its use in various contexts to introduce additional elements or amounts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

85%

Academia

10%

Science

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "there were more" is a grammatically sound and versatile phrase used to indicate an increased quantity in past contexts. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is widely accepted and utilized. Predominantly found in news and media sources, this phrase serves the purpose of adding information and is adaptable to both formal and informal communication. When using "there were more", clarity is key—ensure the context distinctly specifies what is being augmented. Avoid pairing it with singular nouns. The phrase is useful in describing situations where something has increased or is more numerous than previously stated.

FAQs

How can I use "there were more" in a sentence?

Use "there were more" to indicate a quantity or number beyond what has already been mentioned. For example: "Initially, there were five options, but "there were more" after the revision."

What are some alternatives to "there were more"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "additional instances existed", "further examples occurred", or "more existed".

Is it correct to say "there was more" instead of "there were more"?

"There was more" is correct when referring to a singular or uncountable noun, while ""there were more"" is used for plural nouns. For example, "There was more water" vs. "There were more cups."

What's the difference between "there were more" and "there are more"?

"There were more" refers to a past situation, while "there are more" refers to a present situation. For instance, "There were more students last year", but "There are more students this year".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

94%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: