there was no material

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "there was no material" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate the absence of physical substance or content in a particular context, such as a report, project, or discussion. Example: "During the investigation, it was concluded that there was no material evidence to support the claims made."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

55 human-written examples

Patrick Braouezec, the investigator, told a separate news conference there was "no material evidence showing that a policy of quotas had been enforced".

The New York Times - Sports

Until a few years ago, there was no material or fuel as unfashionable as wood.

The Guardian - Books

UBS and J.P. Morgan said there was no material financial impact on the banks.

The New York Times

In Huntsman's case, there was no material adverse change to its business.

The New York Times

As such, Goldman may argue that there was no material misstatement or omission in the documents and statements that it provided investors.

The New York Times

JPMorgan said on its conference call last night that there was no material adverse change clause in the merger agreement and that the only material condition is the "shareholder approval".

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

5 human-written examples

There were no material revelations, but for Jenkins their impact was huge.

The Guardian - Film

But there is no material and nothing has happened," complained local resident Siphiwo Ngcaza.

The Guardian

"If there's no material difference, then it would be misleading to require labeling".

The New York Times

Currently there is no material clinically available as a long-term vitreous substitute.

Polymer

The main feature of GALATEA is that there is no material between source and detector.

Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "there was no material", ensure the context clearly specifies what type of material is absent (e.g., evidence, difference, support) to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "there was no material" in contexts where the type of missing material is unclear. Always specify what kind of material is lacking to provide clarity and avoid vagueness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "there was no material" functions as an existential clause indicating the absence of something. It's commonly used to negate the presence of a specific substance, content, or evidence, as confirmed by Ludwig AI.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

45%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Encyclopedias

1%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "there was no material" is a grammatically sound and commonly used phrase to indicate the absence of something significant or relevant. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and neutrality. It appears frequently in scientific and news contexts. When using this phrase, ensure you specify what type of material is lacking to maintain clarity. Be mindful that while "there was no material" is widely accepted, precision in context is key for effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

there wasn't any material

Uses a contraction and "any" for slightly less formal emphasis.

no material was available

Focuses on the lack of availability of material.

there was a lack of material

Emphasizes the deficiency or shortage of material.

material was absent

More concise and formal, stressing the absence itself.

there was no substance

Replaces "material" with "substance", highlighting a lack of content or importance.

nothing material existed

Emphasizes that no relevant or significant material was present.

there was no evidence

Specifically refers to the absence of supporting evidence.

there was nothing of substance

Highlights the lack of meaningful or valuable content.

there was no significant difference

Focuses on the absence of a meaningful distinction or variation.

no tangible evidence existed

Stresses the absence of concrete, touchable proof.

FAQs

How can I use "there was no material" in a sentence?

Use "there was no material" to indicate the absence of substance, evidence, or significant difference in a given context. For example, "After a thorough investigation, "there was no material" evidence to support the allegations."

What can I say instead of "there was no material"?

You can use alternatives like "no evidence was found", "there was a lack of evidence", or "there was no significant difference" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "there were no material"?

No, it is incorrect. The correct phrasing is ""there was no material"" because "material" is treated as a singular, non-countable noun in this context.

What is the difference between "there was no material" and "there was no substantial" evidence?

While both indicate a lack of something, ""there was no material"" evidence implies a complete absence of relevant evidence, whereas "there was no substantial" evidence suggests that some evidence might exist, but it is not significant or strong enough to support a claim.