there was no marked difference

USAGE SUMMARY

The sentence 'There was no marked difference' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase when you are comparing two things and find no significant differences between them. For example: We conducted an experiment comparing the effectiveness of two different cleaning products, but there was no marked difference between the two.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

42 human-written examples

There was no marked difference between the different age groups in terms of incidence rates (Table 3).

American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

There was no marked difference among polysaccharides extracted using different methods from the infrared spectrum.

International Journal of Biological Macromolecules

There was no marked difference in learning styles with respect to age.

Personality and Individual Differences

As regards water absorption, there was no marked difference between the two blends of brick however reduction in water resistance was slightly greater in bricks containing concrete waste that in those containing ceramic wastes.

Construction and Building Materials

In the Gulf of Lions, sediment granulometry was apparently the most important driving force of THAA, EHAA, and EHAA/THAA, and there was no marked difference between stations located on the open slope and those in submarine canyons.

Progress in Oceanography

The survey for the Westminster Faith debates, a series of events designed to bring academic research into public debate, found there was no marked difference between the views of people with religious affiliations and everybody else.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

18 human-written examples

This is in contrast to the difficult-to-germinate species such as C. bulbosa in which there is no marked difference in cell size (Yeung and Law 1992).

Botanical Studies

There is no marked difference between the spectra for pure and extract added struvite crystals and closely resembles the one published [21].

Clinical Phytoscience

Note that there is no marked difference between the k-NN and the Gaussian method of classification using the projections of the vectors of features.

EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing

There is no marked difference related to the folded or twisted conformations, but, in general, the larger values are obtained for the structures containing the bis-cyclopropyl substituent, indicating the effect of the accommodation of the two bulky ligands in these molecules.

Chemistry Central Journal

There is no marked difference related to the folded or twisted conformations, but, in general, the larger values are obtained for the structures containing the bis-cyclopropyl substituent, indicating the effect of the accommodation of the two bulky ligands in these molecules.  .

Chemistry Central Journal

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When comparing experimental results or different methods, use "there was no marked difference" to indicate that the variations observed were not statistically significant or practically relevant. This clearly communicates that the items being compared are essentially equivalent for the purpose of the study or analysis.

Common error

Avoid using "there was no marked difference" when there are minor variations that, while not statistically significant, could still be relevant in specific contexts. Instead, acknowledge the minor differences and clarify why they are not considered 'marked' in the current analysis.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "there was no marked difference" functions as a statement of comparison, asserting the absence of a significant distinction between two or more entities. As Ludwig AI confirms, this is a common and acceptable usage in written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

81%

News & Media

14%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "there was no marked difference" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to indicate a lack of significant distinction between two or more things. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it's appropriate for use in various contexts, particularly in science, news, and formal writing. While alternatives like "there was no significant difference" or "the difference was negligible" can be used for variety, the core meaning remains consistent: the items being compared are essentially equivalent for the purpose at hand. When using this phrase, ensure that there aren't subtle, but relevant, variations that are getting glossed over.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

there was no significant difference

Replaces "marked" with "significant", emphasizing the lack of statistical or practical importance.

there was no noticeable difference

Substitutes "marked" with "noticeable", highlighting the absence of easily observed distinctions.

there was no substantial difference

Uses "substantial" instead of "marked", suggesting a lack of considerable or meaningful variation.

there was no appreciable difference

Replaces "marked" with "appreciable", indicating that the difference was too small to be important or noticed.

there was little difference

Simplifies the phrasing to express a minimal degree of variation.

the difference was negligible

Uses a different sentence structure to convey that the difference was so small as to be unimportant.

the two were essentially the same

Expresses near identity between the compared items.

they were virtually identical

Emphasizes the lack of any real difference, indicating almost complete sameness.

no clear distinction existed

Focuses on the absence of a distinct separation or differentiation.

the results were comparable

Indicates that the outcomes or measurements were similar enough to allow for comparison without significant discrepancies.

FAQs

What does "there was no marked difference" mean?

The phrase "there was no marked difference" indicates that, upon comparison, the items or results being examined showed no significant or noteworthy variation. The differences, if any, were too small to be considered important.

How can I use "there was no marked difference" in a sentence?

You can use this phrase to compare two or more things and state that they are very similar. For example, "After the changes, "there was no marked difference" in the product's performance."

What can I say instead of "there was no marked difference"?

You can use alternatives like "there was no significant difference", "there was no noticeable difference", or "the difference was negligible" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "there is no marked difference"?

Yes, it is grammatically correct. The tense of the verb 'to be' (is/was) depends on the context. "There is no marked difference" implies a present observation, while ""there was no marked difference"" refers to a past observation.