there is no trace

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "there is no trace" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate the absence of evidence or signs of something. Example: "After searching the area thoroughly, we concluded that there is no trace of the missing hiker."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

(Cut a large piece of chicken to the centre to check there is no trace of pink).

The Guardian - Lifestyle

There is no trace of Oberfest today.

The New Yorker

There is no trace of Jane.

The New Yorker

There is no trace of menace in it.

The New Yorker

Of the ship and its cargo, there is no trace.

The Guardian

And there is no trace of me in that room.

The Guardian

There is no trace of an excretory system.

Encyclopedia Britannica

But there is no trace of DiMaggio here.

The New York Times - Sports

Of this there is no trace in the convention's text.

The Economist

There is no trace of irreverence — just pure innocent fun.

The New York Times - Books

Yet there is no trace of anger in her voice.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "there is no trace" when you want to emphasize the complete absence of something, whether physical evidence or an abstract quality.

Common error

Avoid using "there is no trace" in overly dramatic or clichéd situations, such as crime novels, where it can sound predictable. Opt for more specific or evocative language.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "there is no trace" functions as an existential clause expressing negation. It asserts the non-existence of any sign, evidence, or vestige of something. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a correct and usable phrase.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

57%

Encyclopedias

16%

Science

13%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "there is no trace" is a grammatically sound and widely used expression to indicate the complete absence of something. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness. Predominantly found in News & Media, Encyclopedias and Science, its usage leans toward a neutral to formal register. When writing, it's best to avoid cliché contexts and leverage this phrase to emphasize the thoroughness of absence, choosing alternatives like "there is no sign" or "there is no evidence" for nuanced meanings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

there is no sign

Focuses on the absence of visual or perceptible indications.

there is no evidence

Emphasizes the lack of proof or corroboration.

there is no indication

Highlights the absence of clues or hints.

no sign exists

Shifts the focus to the existence of any sign at all.

nothing indicates

Changes the structure to emphasize the lack of indicators.

there is no vestige

Implies a complete disappearance, with no remaining remnants.

all traces are gone

Highlights the completeness of the disappearance.

no hint remains

Focuses on the lack of any subtle suggestion or clue.

it vanished without a trace

Expresses the complete and mysterious disappearance of something.

there is no remaining presence

Emphasizes the complete absence of anything left.

FAQs

How can I use "there is no trace" in a sentence?

Use "there is no trace" to indicate a complete absence of something. For example, "After the thorough cleaning, "there is no trace" of the spilled coffee."

What can I say instead of "there is no trace"?

You can use alternatives like "there is no sign", "there is no evidence", or "no vestige remains" depending on the context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "there is no trace"?

Yes, it is grammatically correct. The phrase follows standard English grammar rules for existential clauses and negation.

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "there is no trace"?

It is appropriate when you want to emphasize that something has completely disappeared or that there is absolutely no evidence or indication of its existence.