there is no host of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "there is no host of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate the absence of a large number of something, typically in a context where one might expect a group or collection. Example: "In this deserted area, there is no host of wildlife to be seen."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

There is no host of the series.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Second, loss of a CDC when there's no host may reduce the cost of carrying extra genome content.

BMC Genomics

However, before concluding that there are no host restriction determinants, further analysis of longer sequences is required.

Emerging Infectious Diseases

There was no host species specificity in the grouping of the isolates from snakes and lizards.

Virus Research

As the agents that cause bovine theileriosis infect and transform host cell PBMCs, we confirmed that T. equi infects equine PBMCs, however, there is no evidence of host cell transformation.

BMC Genomics

Although there is no shortage of hosting options in the market, these sorts of packages appeal to the less computer literate and the main competition here is Yahoo.

TechCrunch

No superficial mycelium was seen and there is no penetration of the host tissue.

New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science

In all, both studies show that early in the course of the infection, there is no obvious dysregulation of the host response with the potential exception of an imbalance in regulatory T lymphocytes, noted above.

BMC Systems Biology

It has been observed that if transmissions have occurred mostly from individuals in the early stage of infection, there is no major impact of the host immune system, so less selective pressure is applied and fewer mutations accumulate in the virus transmitted [ 41].

BMC Infectious Diseases

Unlike allogeneic transplantation, autologous transplantation is a more simple procedure that can be performed safely in older patients, because there is no risk of graft-versus-host disease as a complication [ 2].

BMC Cancer

This is in agreement with the literature, where 40 to 55 years is considered the oldest age for patients undergoing allogeneic transplantation and autologous transplantation is reported to be safer in older patients, because there is no risk of graft-versus-host disease as a complication [ 2].

BMC Cancer

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "there is no host of" to emphasize the unexpected absence of something typically found in abundance. For example, "Despite the rumors, there is no host of secret tunnels beneath the city."

Common error

Avoid using "there is no host of" when referring to a single item or entity. The phrase is intended to convey the absence of a large number or variety, not the absence of a single element.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "there is no host of" functions as a declarative statement expressing the absence of a large number or variety of something. This is supported by Ludwig's analysis, which shows its use in contexts where the presence of multiple entities might be expected.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "there is no host of" is a grammatically correct expression used to denote the absence of a large number or variety of something. Ludwig AI analysis confirms that the phrase is most commonly found in News & Media and Scientific contexts and functions to negate an expected abundance. Though not exceedingly common, it serves a specific purpose in highlighting a lack, and related alternatives include "there aren't many" and "there is a lack of". It is crucial to use this phrase when addressing an absence of many items, not just a single one.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

there aren't many

Focuses on quantity, suggesting a scarcity or lack of numerous items.

there is a lack of

Highlights the deficiency or absence of something, either tangible or intangible.

there is a scarcity of

Emphasizes a shortage or insufficient amount of something.

there is a dearth of

Indicates a significant absence or lack, often in a formal context.

few exist

States that only a small number of something are present or available.

there is a limited number of

Highlights the restriction on the amount or quantity available.

there are hardly any

Suggests that something is barely present or almost nonexistent.

very few

Emphasizes the small quantity or number of something.

not many

A simple way to express that the quantity or number is small.

there's a shortage of

Highlights a deficiency in supply or availability.

FAQs

How can I use "there is no host of" in a sentence?

Use "there is no host of" to indicate the absence of a large number or variety of something. For example, "Despite the area's reputation, "there is no host of" dangerous wildlife in the park."

What's a more formal way to say "there is no host of"?

For a more formal tone, you could use phrases such as "there is a dearth of", "there is a scarcity of", or "there is a marked absence of". These alternatives convey a similar meaning while maintaining a higher level of formality.

Is it correct to say "there are no host of"?

No, the correct phrase is "there is no host of". "Host of" functions as a singular collective noun in this context, requiring the singular verb "is".

What is the difference between "there is a host of" and "there is no host of"?

"There is a host of" means there is a large number or variety of something. In contrast, "there is no host of" means that such a large number or variety is absent.