their contribution

USAGE SUMMARY

'their contribution' is correct and can be used in written English.
For example, "The teachers were pleased with their contribution to the project's success."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Their contribution to GDP?

Independent

But their contribution is significant.

The New York Times

During lunch, their contribution is quickly obvious.

The New York Times - Magazine

Others were proud of their contribution.

The New York Times

"We appreciate their contribution to our society.

The New York Times

"Employees must make their contribution".

The Guardian - Business

Instead, he highlights their contribution.

The Guardian

They are precise about their contribution.

The Guardian - Film

How will we remember their contribution?

The Guardian - Sport

And how much is their contribution worth?

The Guardian - Music

"And I love that... that's their contribution".

The Guardian - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "their contribution", ensure the context clearly defines who 'they' refers to. Ambiguity can confuse the reader.

Common error

Avoid overstating "their contribution" if it was minimal. Accurately represent the scale and impact to maintain credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "their contribution" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence. It denotes something provided or given by a group. Ludwig AI confirms its common usage, indicating its role in expressing collective input or impact.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

35%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Academia

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "their contribution" is a commonly used and grammatically correct noun phrase that serves to acknowledge and evaluate the input or impact of a group. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, its frequent appearance across diverse sources such as News & Media and Science underscores its versatility and importance in both formal and informal contexts. To effectively use "their contribution", ensure clarity in identifying who "they" refers to and accurately represent the scope of their impact. Alternatives like "their input" or "their impact" can be considered for nuanced expression.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

their input

Focuses on the act of providing something, like ideas or resources.

their part

Emphasizes a share or role in a larger effort.

their impact

Highlights the effect or influence they had.

their role

Focuses on the function or position they held.

their assistance

Highlights the help they provided.

their efforts

Emphasizes the work they put in.

their involvement

Focuses on their participation or engagement.

their share

Highlights the portion or responsibility they undertook.

the part they played

Emphasizes their specific role or action.

what they added

Focuses on the value or addition they brought.

FAQs

How can I use "their contribution" in a sentence?

You can use "their contribution" to acknowledge the impact or role a group played in an event, project, or situation. For example: "The success of the project was largely due to "their contribution".".

What are some alternatives to "their contribution"?

Alternatives include "their input", "their impact", or "their part", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "there contribution" instead of "their contribution"?

No, "there contribution" is incorrect. "Their" indicates possession, referring to a group's contribution, while "there" indicates a place or existence.

What's the difference between "their contribution" and "its contribution"?

"Their contribution" refers to the contribution of a group or multiple entities, while "its contribution" refers to the contribution of a single entity, typically an organization or inanimate object. For instance, "the company's contribution" vs. "the employees' contribution".