Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
the results were consistent
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "the results were consistent" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing findings or outcomes that show reliability or stability across different tests or observations. Example: "After analyzing the data from multiple experiments, we concluded that the results were consistent, indicating a strong correlation between the variables."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
The results were consistent with arsenic poisoning.
News & Media
"All the results were consistent," said Lee Haney, the Brown County district attorney.
News & Media
The results were consistent for both male and female managers.
News & Media
The results were consistent with LeT.
Science
The results were consistent with theoretical expectations.
Both the results were consistent within estimation errors.
Science
The results were consistent with the adsorption isotherm results.
Science
The results were consistent with the hypothesis posed in "Introduction".
The results were consistent with expectation under the RQH.
The results were consistent with previous pharmacological studies.
Science
The results were consistent with those obtained by other methods.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using this phrase, ensure that the context clearly specifies what the results are consistent with, such as a hypothesis, previous studies, or theoretical expectations.
Common error
Avoid using the phrase without specifying what the results are consistent with. For example, instead of just saying "the results were consistent", specify "the results were consistent with previous research" or "the results were consistent across all trials" to provide clarity and context.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "the results were consistent" functions as a declarative statement, asserting the reliability and stability of findings. As Ludwig AI states, it is grammatically correct and widely applicable across various contexts. It's commonly used to summarize the outcome of experiments, studies, or analyses.
Frequent in
Science
61%
News & Media
29%
Wiki
2%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "the results were consistent" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase for indicating that outcomes remained stable across multiple trials or conditions. Ludwig AI validates this by marking this sentence as correct and usable in written English. It is most commonly found in scientific and news media contexts, reflecting a neutral to formal register. When using this phrase, it's important to specify what the results are consistent with to provide clarity and enhance the impact of your findings. Alternatives include "the findings aligned" or "the outcomes were uniform", offering slight variations in emphasis.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
the findings aligned
Changes the noun from "results" to "findings" and uses "aligned" to convey consistency.
the outcomes were uniform
Substitutes "results" with "outcomes" and "consistent" with "uniform" to suggest a standardized result.
the data corroborated
Replaces the phrase with a more concise and technical term, implying that the data supports each other.
the measurements concurred
Uses "measurements" instead of "results" and "concurred" to indicate agreement among the measurements.
the patterns matched
Focuses on the agreement of patterns rather than general results.
there was agreement among the results
Rephrases to emphasize the presence of agreement, rather than stating consistency directly.
the results were in agreement
Rephrases to emphasize agreement, changing from adjective to prepositional phrase.
the evidence supported
Shifts focus to the supportive nature of evidence, suggesting consistency.
the observations coincided
Implies that observations occurred together in a consistent manner.
the findings were replicated
Highlights that the results were successfully reproduced, implying consistency.
FAQs
How can I use "the results were consistent" in a sentence?
You can use "the results were consistent" to indicate that the findings of a study or experiment remained stable across multiple tests or conditions. For example, "After analyzing the data from multiple experiments, we concluded that "the results were consistent", indicating a strong correlation between the variables."
What can I say instead of "the results were consistent"?
You can use alternatives like "the findings aligned", "the outcomes were uniform", or "the data corroborated" depending on the context.
Is it correct to say "the result was consistent"?
While grammatically correct, "the result was consistent" is typically used when referring to a single result. "The results were consistent" is more appropriate when discussing multiple findings or a pattern across different tests.
What does it mean when "the results were consistent"?
When ""the results were consistent"", it means that the outcomes or findings of a study, experiment, or analysis remained stable or similar across multiple trials, conditions, or datasets, indicating reliability and validity.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested