Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
the previous evidence
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "the previous evidence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to evidence that has been mentioned or presented earlier in a text or discussion. Example: "Based on the previous evidence, we can conclude that the hypothesis is valid."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
The company is likely to face questions over the previous evidence it provided to the Senate in the upcoming hearings.
News & Media
Much of the previous evidence suggesting that Tamiflu was effective against flu complications came from combining the results of 10 clinical trials into a so-called meta-analysis, which was published in 2003.
News & Media
Despite the excitement of the previous evidence from laboratory, animal and observational studies, and the plausibilty of the explanation of how beta carotene might work inside the human body, the clinical trials were methodologically sound and large enough to leave little uncertainty about their conclusions.
News & Media
Furthermore, the previous evidence is mainly based on US data or on north European countries.
We next estimate a set of econometric models to investigate the statistical significance of the previous evidence.
Science
"This is maybe not quite a smoking gun," he says, "but it's much stronger than the previous evidence".
Science & Research
Such low friction and the previous evidence of a high-temperature fluid suggest that thermal pressurization likely contributed to dynamic weakening during the Chi-Chi earthquake.
Science
The previous evidence that GB was not detected in the axenic culture of S. sp. PCC 7002 with comparable salinity further corroborated our observation (Cumino et al. 2010).
Science
The previous evidence mentioned above and the present results may thus be explained by the differences in the growth phase at which the patients received treatment.
Science
They attributed much of the previous evidence of a warming slowdown to a failure to fully account for discrepancies in different ways of measuring ocean temperatures.
Science & Research
Thus, such low apparent friction coefficient and the previous evidence of a high-temperature fluid suggest that thermal pressurization likely contributed to dynamically weakening the fault during the Chi-Chi earthquake.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When referring to "the previous evidence", clearly specify the source or context from which it originates to avoid ambiguity. For example, "According to the previous evidence presented in the Smith et al. study..."
Common error
Avoid using "the previous evidence" as a broad statement without providing context or specific details. Always ensure your audience knows exactly what evidence you're referencing to maintain clarity and credibility.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "the previous evidence" functions as a determiner phrase identifying specific evidence that has been presented or discussed earlier. Ludwig AI indicates the phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English.
Frequent in
Science
68%
News & Media
18%
Formal & Business
14%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Social Media
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "the previous evidence" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase, as verified by Ludwig, primarily found in scientific and news-related contexts. It serves to reference information already presented, enhancing clarity and credibility. Related phrases include "the prior evidence" and "the aforementioned evidence". To use it effectively, always provide clear context to avoid ambiguity. While versatile, it's best suited for formal and neutral registers. Avoid overgeneralization and always specify which evidence is being referenced to maintain clear communication. Using "the previous evidence" is common in academic and scientific contexts but less so in informal settings.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
the prior evidence
Replaces "previous" with "prior", indicating something that came before.
the earlier evidence
Substitutes "previous" with "earlier", emphasizing a point in time before the current one.
the preceding evidence
Uses "preceding" instead of "previous", highlighting the evidence that immediately came before.
the aforementioned evidence
Replaces "previous" with "aforementioned", referring to evidence already mentioned in the text.
the foregoing evidence
Employs "foregoing" instead of "previous", indicating evidence that has been presented earlier.
the existing evidence
Focuses on the evidence that already exists, without necessarily specifying when it was presented.
the established evidence
Highlights that the evidence is well-established and recognized.
the documented evidence
Emphasizes the fact that the evidence has been formally recorded.
the historical evidence
Indicates that the evidence pertains to historical events or data.
the collected evidence
Highlights the gathering or accumulation of evidence.
FAQs
How can I use "the previous evidence" in a research paper?
In a research paper, "the previous evidence" is used to refer back to studies or findings already discussed. For instance, "The current study builds upon "the previous evidence" suggesting a correlation between X and Y."
What's a more formal alternative to "the previous evidence"?
A more formal alternative is "the aforementioned evidence". It clearly points back to evidence that has already been cited or presented in the document.
How does "the previous evidence" differ from "the current evidence"?
"The previous evidence" refers to past findings, while "the current evidence" refers to new data or findings being presented in the present context. The former builds a foundation, the latter adds to it.
Is it appropriate to use "the previous evidence" in casual conversation?
While grammatically correct, "the previous evidence" sounds more formal than everyday speech. In casual conversation, you might say "what we knew before" or "the earlier data" depending on the context.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested