the effects of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "the effects of" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to the effects of an action, situation, or event. For example: "The effects of global warming can be seen in extreme weather patterns around the world."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

The effects of isolation?

The New York Times - Arts

The effects of the training were evident.

The New Yorker

The effects of that withdrawal were twofold.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The effects of Zika are usually mild.

Independent

I felt the effects of it.

The New York Times

These amplify the effects of other factors.

The Economist

The effects of this cannot be underestimated.

Independent

Take the effects of fuel-efficiency standards.

The Economist

And the effects of unemployment linger.

The New Yorker

The effects of regionalism were profound.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The effects of elevation are negligible.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing causation, clarify what exactly is causing the effects you're describing. For example, instead of just stating "the effects of technology", specify "the effects of social media technology on interpersonal relationships".

Common error

Avoid using "the effects of" without specifying the scope or context. Saying "the effects of immigration" is too broad. Instead, focus on specific effects like "the effects of immigration on local economies".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "the effects of" functions as a noun phrase that introduces the consequences or outcomes resulting from a specific action, event, or situation. Ludwig examples show its versatile usage across different contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

39%

Wiki

20%

Encyclopedias

12%

Less common in

Science

11%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "the effects of" is a commonly used phrase to introduce the consequences or outcomes of an action, event, or situation. As affirmed by Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct and widely applicable across various contexts. It is frequently found in news media, encyclopedias, and wiki sources, making it a versatile choice for describing impacts in both formal and informal settings. When using this phrase, ensure to provide specific details about the cause and the resulting effects to avoid overgeneralizations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

the consequences of

Focuses specifically on the results or outcomes of an action or event, often implying a negative result.

the impacts of

Emphasizes the force or influence exerted by something, highlighting its effects.

the results of

Directly indicates the outcome or findings of a process or experiment.

the outcomes of

Similar to 'results', but can also refer to broader, less tangible consequences.

the ramifications of

Implies wider-reaching and often complex consequences that stem from an initial event.

the repercussions of

Often used to describe the negative or adverse effects that follow a particular action.

the implications of

Highlights the potential future effects and indirect consequences of something.

the aftereffects of

Specifically refers to the effects that occur after an event has passed, focusing on the lingering impact.

the side effects of

Typically used in medical or technical contexts to describe secondary, often unintended, consequences.

the products of

Indicates something that is created or produced as a result of a process or action.

FAQs

How can I use "the effects of" in a sentence?

Use "the effects of" to introduce the results or consequences of a particular action, situation, or event. For example, "The effects of climate change are becoming increasingly visible".

What are some alternatives to using "the effects of"?

You can use alternatives like "the consequences of", "the impacts of", or "the results of" depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use "effects of" or "impacts of"?

While both are acceptable, "effects of" generally refers to any result or consequence, while "impacts of" often implies a stronger or more significant influence. Choose based on the degree of influence you wish to emphasize.

What's the difference between "the effects of" and "the cause of"?

"The effects of" refers to the consequences or outcomes resulting from something, while "the cause of" refers to the reason or origin of something. They represent opposite sides of a causal relationship.