the consequences of

USAGE SUMMARY

"the consequences of" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is used to explain the results or effects of a given action. For example, "The consequences of not wearing a seatbelt can be very serious."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The consequences of that, however, remained unclear.

The New York Times

The consequences of these differences are huge.

The New York Times

Hauer knew the consequences of winter.

The New Yorker

The consequences of failure, though, are serious.

The Economist

The consequences of continued inaction are dire.

The New York Times

Yemen has witnessed the consequences of this.

Independent

"The consequences of this terrify me".

The New York Times

However, the consequences of this are unclear.

The Economist

People will consider the consequences of actions.

The New Yorker

The consequences of all this were tragic.

The New Yorker

The consequences of inaction are dire.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing "the consequences of" an action, be specific. Instead of vague statements, clearly outline the potential outcomes and impacts.

Common error

Avoid presenting potential consequences as guaranteed outcomes. Qualify statements with words like "may", "could", or "can" to reflect the inherent uncertainty in predicting future events.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "the consequences of" functions as a noun phrase that introduces the results or effects stemming from a specific action, event, or condition. Ludwig AI shows numerous examples where this phrase connects an action to its potential outcomes.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Wiki

20%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Science

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "the consequences of" is a versatile phrase used to discuss the results or effects of actions or situations. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and very commonly used across various contexts, particularly in news media, formal business, and general informational writing. While "the consequences of" often implies a cause-and-effect relationship, it is important to avoid overstating the certainty of the potential outcomes. Alternatives like "the result of" or "the ramifications of" can offer subtle differences in meaning, allowing for more precise communication. Being mindful of these nuances ensures clarity and accuracy in writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

the result of

Focuses on the direct outcome, suggesting a more immediate effect than the original phrase.

the upshot of

Implies a final or decisive result, often after a series of events or actions.

the ramifications of

Emphasizes the complex and far-reaching effects of something.

the repercussions of

Highlights the often negative and indirect consequences.

the effects of

A more general term that covers all types of results or impacts.

the outcome of

Stresses the final state or condition that follows an event or process.

the implications of

Points to the potential future effects or conclusions that can be drawn.

the fallout from

Suggests negative consequences or disruptions that follow a specific event.

the aftermath of

Refers to the period and the conditions that exist immediately after a significant event.

the product of

Emphasizes that something is a direct result of a particular cause or process.

FAQs

How can I use "the consequences of" in a sentence?

You can use "the consequences of" to discuss the results or effects of an action or situation. For example, "The consequences of climate change are becoming increasingly apparent".

What are some alternatives to "the consequences of"?

Alternatives include "the result of", "the upshot of", or "the ramifications of", depending on the specific context.

What is the difference between "the consequences of" and "the effects of"?

"The consequences of" often implies a cause-and-effect relationship, focusing on what logically follows a particular action. "The effects of" is a more general term that can encompass a broader range of impacts without necessarily implying direct causation.

Is it better to use "the consequences of" or "the impact of" in formal writing?

Both phrases are suitable for formal writing. "The consequences of" is useful when discussing the logical outcomes of a decision or event. "The impact of" is better suited when emphasizing the measurable or significant effect on something.