that would amount to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "that would amount to" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something will result in a particular consequence or equivalent value. Example: "If we ignore the feedback, that would amount to a lack of respect for our clients' opinions."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

But these days, that would amount to middling pay.

The New York Times

For the industry, that would amount to about $30 billion.

The New York Times

In any business, that would amount to a crisis.

The Guardian - Opinion

For a $2,000 premium, that would amount to a credit of only about $500.

The New York Times

At the recent sales rate, that would amount to a three or four months' supply.

The New York Times

If the bishops take such a position, that would amount to a rejection of the directive.

The New York Times

On $660 million of bonds, that would amount to $99 million.

The New York Times

In Facebook's case, that would amount to almost $2 billion, based on 2017 revenues.

Vice

That would amount to five hundred sixty million dollars.

The New Yorker

But that would amount to regime change.

The Guardian

That would amount to some legacy.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "that would amount to" when you want to clearly state the final result or total of a calculation or action. It's useful for summarizing or concluding a point.

Common error

Avoid using "that would amount to" when describing subjective feelings or opinions. It is best suited for quantifiable results or factual consequences.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "that would amount to" functions as a linking phrase, connecting a condition or action to its result or equivalent value. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

64%

Formal & Business

18%

Science

18%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "that would amount to" is a versatile linking phrase commonly used to indicate the result, total, or equivalent of something. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically sound and frequently appears in news, business, and other contexts where quantifying outcomes is necessary. The phrase functions to connect an action or condition to its quantifiable consequence and maintains a neutral tone. While "that would amount to" is best suited for factual statements, alternative phrases such as ""that would result in"" or ""that would be equivalent to"" offer variations to refine the intended meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

that would be equivalent to

Replaces "amount to" with a synonym, emphasizing equivalence.

that would be equal to

Similar to "equivalent to", but focuses on quantitative equality.

that would result in

Shifts focus to the consequence or outcome of an action.

that would translate to

Suggests a conversion or representation into something else.

that would come out to

Informal way of indicating a total or final calculation.

that would work out to

Similar to "come out to", implying a calculation or result.

that would signify

Emphasizes the meaning or implication of something.

that would constitute

Highlights the composition or elements of something.

that would represent

Focuses on the act of portraying or symbolizing something.

that would entail

Stresses the necessary consequence or involvement.

FAQs

How can I use "that would amount to" in a sentence?

Use "that would amount to" to express a consequence, sum, or equivalent. For example, "If we increase production by 20%, "that would amount to" an additional 500 units per month."

What phrases can I use instead of "that would amount to"?

Alternatives include "that would be equivalent to", "that would result in", or "that would translate to", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "this would amount to" instead of "that would amount to"?

Both are grammatically correct, but "that" generally refers to something previously mentioned or understood, while "this" refers to something in the immediate context or about to be mentioned. The choice depends on the context of your sentence.

What's the difference between "that would amount to" and "that would be"?

"That would be" is a more general statement of identity or description. "That would amount to" implies a calculation or consequence. For instance, "That would be a good idea" is different from ""that would amount to" a significant cost savings".