Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

that was huge

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "that was huge" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to express that something was significant, impressive, or impactful in a particular context. Example: "The announcement of the new product line was huge for the company, leading to a surge in sales."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Sports

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

At the time that was huge.

News & Media

Independent

Talking about a turn of events, that was huge".

"That was within hours — that was huge," Fliedner said, nodding.

News & Media

The New Yorker

"To win it once, that was huge," Leipheimer said.

Yes, that was huge over there [and in the US].

News & Media

The Guardian

To score six runs against their bullpen, that was huge".

But I guess the one that was huge was my 100th try.

The public interest that was "huge" in his eyes is general, not specific.

News & Media

The Guardian

For us moving forward as a club that was huge mentally more than physically.

News & Media

BBC

In a world driven by competition and plagued by overt and unconscious biases, that was HUGE.

Science & Research

Science Magazine

But we won and that was huge!

News & Media

Huffington Post
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "that was huge" to emphasize the importance or impact of a particular event, decision, or achievement. It's suitable for expressing strong positive or negative consequences.

Common error

Avoid using "that was huge" excessively, as it can diminish its impact. Instead, diversify your language by incorporating synonyms like "significant", "monumental", or more specific descriptors relevant to the context.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "that was huge" primarily functions as a declarative statement expressing the significance or impact of a past event or situation. Ludwig AI examples show its frequent use in highlighting pivotal moments across diverse contexts. It underscores importance, consequence, or scale, emphasizing the magnitude of something that has occurred.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

62%

Sports

25%

Academia

5%

Less common in

Wiki

1%

Science & Research

1%

Formal & Business

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "that was huge" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to emphasize the significance or impact of a past event. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, its versatility makes it applicable across various contexts, from news and sports to academic discussions, though it leans towards a neutral to informal register. While generally acceptable, it's essential to avoid overuse and consider more formal alternatives like "significant" or "monumental" in professional settings. Remember to use "that was huge" judiciously to maximize its expressive power and ensure clarity in your writing.

FAQs

How can I use "that was huge" in a sentence?

Use "that was huge" to emphasize the significance or impact of an event. For example, "Winning the championship, "that was huge" for our team's morale."

What are some alternatives to saying "that was huge"?

Is it correct to say "that was huge" in formal writing?

While grammatically correct, "that was huge" may be considered informal for academic or professional writing. Opt for more precise and formal alternatives such as "that was significant" or "that was substantial".

What's the difference between "that was huge" and "that was important"?

"That was huge" implies a greater degree of impact or magnitude than "that was important". "That was important" simply indicates significance, while ""that was huge"" suggests a major, often transformative effect.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: