tests of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "tests of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to evaluations or assessments of a particular subject, skill, or quality. Example: "The tests of endurance were challenging, but they helped us gauge our physical limits."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Crash tests of new vehicles.

The New York Times

Tests of independence.

Stanford University

Art works became tests of initiation.

The New Yorker

Any tests of strength or agility?

The New York Times

Her interrogations were tests of character.

The New York Times - Books

What are those tests of knowledge?

The New York Times

Some tests of the L.T.E.

The New York Times - Tech

Quantum optical tests of complementarity.

Nature

Genetic tests of prostate tissue.

Harvard University

3. Load tests of circuits.

Cornell University

Gene tests of feces identified individual chimpanzees.

The New York Times - Science

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "tests of", ensure the context clearly indicates what is being evaluated. For example, "tests of strength" implies evaluation of physical power, while "tests of character" suggests moral or ethical assessment.

Common error

Avoid using "tests of" with abstract nouns where a more direct verb would be clearer. Instead of "tests of understanding", consider "testing understanding" or "assessing comprehension".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "tests of" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically acting as a modifier to a noun. It describes the purpose or nature of the tests being referred to. This aligns with Ludwig AI's observation that the phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Academia

25%

Science

22%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "tests of" is a grammatically sound and frequently used prepositional phrase that serves to specify the nature and purpose of evaluations or assessments. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and usable status across various contexts. Predominantly found in news, academic, and scientific writing, it maintains a neutral to formal register. When using this phrase, clarity is key, ensuring that the object of the test is clearly identified to avoid ambiguity. Consider replacing it with alternatives like "assessments of" or "evaluations of" for stylistic variation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

assessments of

Replaces "tests" with a more formal term for evaluation.

evaluations of

Similar to "assessments", but emphasizes a judgment of worth.

examinations of

Suggests a more detailed or formal investigation.

trials of

Emphasizes the experimental nature of the process.

checks on

Implies a simpler, less rigorous form of testing.

investigations into

Highlights a more thorough and probing inquiry.

analyses of

Focuses on breaking down and understanding the components.

studies of

Highlights an academic or scientific exploration.

scrutinies of

Implies a critical and careful examination.

verifications of

Focuses on confirming the truth or accuracy.

FAQs

How can I use "tests of" in a sentence?

The phrase "tests of" is used to describe the evaluation or assessment of something. For example, "The crash "tests of" new vehicles are crucial for safety standards" or "The professor designed rigorous "tests of" knowledge for the students".

What are some alternatives to "tests of"?

Alternatives to "tests of" include "assessments of", "evaluations of", or "examinations of", depending on the specific context and the level of formality required.

Is there a difference between "tests of" and "testing of"?

"Tests of" is generally used to describe the types of evaluations or assessments, while "testing of" refers to the act or process of performing those tests. For example, "Tests of the new software revealed several bugs," versus "The "testing of" the new software is still ongoing".

Which is correct: "tests of strength" or "strength tests"?

Both phrases are correct, but they have slightly different emphasis. "Tests of strength" emphasizes the evaluation of the quality of strength, while "strength tests" emphasizes the tests designed to measure strength. The choice depends on the intended focus.