tests against

USAGE SUMMARY

"tests against" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that someone or something is being measured against a particular standard. For example, "We ran tests against the new software to see if it met our requirements."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It was Argentina's eighth win in a row in tests against Romania.

Independent

He played two Tests, against Australia in 1993.

The Guardian - Sport

Only three of those matches are tests against the Springboks.

The New York Times - Sports

So far, he added, the program has done no comprehensive ground tests against nuclear assaults.

The New York Times - Science

Now they have consecutive tough road tests against Toledo and Navy.

The New York Times - Sports

Intel says Medfield ranks well in benchmark tests against competing chips on the market.

The Guardian - Tech

South Africa have won their last three Tests against England at Newlands, their fortress ground.

The Guardian - Sport

For the first time since 1953, the Kangaroos lost consecutive Tests against New Zealand.

The Guardian - Sport

"We have a short turnaround between major Tests against England and France," said Henry.

The Guardian - Sport

Interstate green won out in tests against blue and black backgrounds around the same time.

The New York Times

The real tests, against Austria, Serbia and the Republic of Ireland, lie ahead.

The Guardian - Sport

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "tests against", ensure that the context clearly defines the criteria or standards against which something is being tested. This provides clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "tests against" when a more specific verb, such as "validate", "verify", or "compare", would be more appropriate. Choosing the most precise term enhances clarity and professionalism.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "tests against" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase, often used to describe the act of evaluating something in relation to a specific standard, benchmark, or control. As Ludwig AI confirms, it indicates measurement against a particular criterion.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

35%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "tests against" is a common and grammatically correct prepositional phrase used to describe the evaluation of something against specific criteria or standards. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and usability. It is frequently employed in scientific and news contexts, reflecting its role in formal evaluations and reporting. While alternatives like "trials against" or "assessments against" exist, "tests against" provides a clear and concise way to indicate a comparative evaluation process. When using this phrase, clarity regarding the evaluation criteria is essential. The most frequent authoritative sources where this expression is used are BBC, The Guardian, The New York Times, Independent and TechCrunch.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

trials against

Replaces "tests" with "trials", emphasizing the experimental nature of the evaluation.

assessments against

Substitutes "tests" with "assessments", focusing on the process of evaluating something.

evaluations against

Replaces "tests" with "evaluations", highlighting the judgment aspect of the process.

comparisons against

Substitutes "tests" with "comparisons", emphasizing the act of comparing results.

benchmarks against

Replaces "tests" with "benchmarks", implying a standardized measure for comparison.

validation against

Substitutes "tests" with "validation", focusing on confirming the accuracy of something.

verification against

Replaces "tests" with "verification", emphasizing the confirmation of truth or accuracy.

analysis against

Replaces "tests" with "analysis", highlighting the detailed examination for comparison.

experiments against

Substitutes "tests" with "experiments", focusing on the scientific process of the evaluation.

checks against

Replaces "tests" with "checks", suggesting a simpler, more basic form of evaluation.

FAQs

How to use "tests against" in a sentence?

You can use "tests against" to describe the act of evaluating something based on a specific standard or criteria. For example, "The software underwent rigorous "tests against" industry benchmarks."

What can I say instead of "tests against"?

You can use alternatives like "trials against", "assessments against", or "evaluations against" depending on the specific context.

Which is correct, "tests against" or "tests on"?

Both phrases are correct, but they have different meanings. "Tests against" implies comparison to a standard, while "tests on" implies the subject of the testing. For instance, "Tests against industry standards" versus "Tests on animals".

What's the difference between "tests against" and "comparisons with"?

"Tests against" generally refers to formal or structured evaluations. In contrast, "comparisons with" suggests a broader, potentially less structured assessment of similarities and differences.