Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

tested with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "tested with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it in the context of testing something against another factor to see how they compare. For example: "The new model of computer was tested with the previous version to assess the improved performance."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He tested with the Central Intelligence Agency.

It was tested with crash test dummies.

News & Media

The Guardian

Correlation was tested with Spearman correlation.

Science & Research

Nature

It has been tested with lammpi.

It has not been tested with mbox.

Identify what's being tested with each prototype.

Stereovision is usually tested with clinical stereotests.

Application thoroughly tested with no obvious bugs.

This kernel is tested with selfTest.

This model has already been tested with disastrous results.

News & Media

The New York Times

In fact, we've focused tested with kids younger than four.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing a test, be specific about what was "tested with". Providing detail enhances clarity and strengthens the validity of your statement.

Common error

Avoid using "tested with" without a clear subject. Ensure the reader understands what is being tested to prevent ambiguity. For example, instead of "It was tested with good results", specify "The new algorithm was tested with positive results".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "tested with" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a verb, typically in the passive voice. It indicates the means, tools, or methods employed during a testing or evaluation process. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and wide usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

46%

News & Media

28%

Academia

26%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The prepositional phrase "tested with" is a grammatically sound and versatile construction used to specify the means or conditions under which a test or evaluation has been carried out. Ludwig AI validates its correctness and broad applicability. Predominantly found in scientific, academic, and news media contexts, as demonstrated by the provided examples, this phrase serves to clarify the testing methodology, enhance the validity of findings, and maintain transparency. When employing "tested with", be precise about the test subject to avoid ambiguity. Consider related phrases such as "evaluated using" or "assessed via" to add nuance and variety to your writing.

FAQs

How can I use "tested with" in a sentence?

The phrase "tested with" is used to indicate the method, tool, or substance used during a testing process. For example, "The software was "tested with" various datasets to ensure its reliability."

What is a good alternative to "tested with"?

Depending on the context, alternatives to "tested with" include "evaluated using", "assessed via", or "examined through". For instance, instead of "The hypothesis was "tested with" a carbon cycle model", you could say "The hypothesis was "evaluated using" a carbon cycle model".

Is it correct to say "the product was tested" or "the product was tested with"?

Both phrases can be correct, depending on the context. "The product was tested" implies that a test occurred, but doesn't specify what it was tested with. "The product was "tested with"" requires additional information about the testing method or tool used.

What's the difference between "validated using" and "tested with"?

"Tested with" simply indicates that a test was performed, while "validated using" suggests that the testing aimed to confirm the accuracy or effectiveness of something. Validation implies a higher standard of proof than simply testing.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: