tested objectively

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "tested objectively" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a process or evaluation that is conducted without bias or personal influence, ensuring that the results are based solely on measurable criteria. Example: "The new software was tested objectively to ensure that it met all performance standards without any subjective bias."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

This approach needs to be validated within a CSEP-type framework, where the performance of a given forecasting model can be tested objectively in a verifiable way.

Earth, Planets and Space

This approach then again needs to be tested within a CSEP-type framework, where the performance of a given forecasting model can be tested objectively in a verifiable way.

Earth, Planets and Space

The ability of a human observer to detect the difference between compressed and original images can also be tested objectively, or their subjective preference or opinion as to the quality can be determined.

Insights into Imaging

For the objective experiments, the measurements are only made as HIF1 for the LF listener, HIF2 for the LF and BR listener, and PIF1 for the FL listener, in other words, not all configurations listed in Table 1 were tested objectively.

EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing

However, it can still be tested objectively whether the patient actually detected some type of correlation between his/her behavior and the observed display.

Plosone

Information bias including observer bias was reduced by all teams receiving training using experienced ophthalmologists and by having inter-observer variability tested objectively.

Plosone

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

But this makes claims of efficacy impossible to test objectively.

The Economist

It is important to use scientific teaching in our classes, that is, to test objectively any new teaching activity that we develop to ensure that it is indeed increasing student learning (Handelsman et al., 2004).

CBE Life Sciences Education

Various other methods are being tested for objectively assessing the response to rituximab treatment.

European Journal of Hybrid Imaging

Based on these facts, verifiable hypotheses are proposed, objectively tested by further experiments, and thereby proven or discarded".

Applied Water Science

"They are made as actual facts and their truthfulness can be objectively tested with evidence".

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "tested objectively", ensure the criteria for testing are clearly defined and measurable. This reinforces the objectivity of the process.

Common error

Avoid adding subjective interpretations after claiming something has been "tested objectively". This undermines the claim of objectivity and introduces bias.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "tested objectively" functions as a descriptor, clarifying how an evaluation or assessment was conducted. It indicates that the testing process relies on measurable, verifiable criteria, free from subjective bias. As Ludwig AI highlights, this approach ensures the results are based on concrete evidence.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

75%

News & Media

20%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "tested objectively" is grammatically correct and used to convey that an evaluation was performed without bias, relying on measurable criteria. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and usability. While not extremely common, it appears most frequently in scientific and news contexts, signifying its importance in these domains. When using this phrase, ensure the testing criteria are clear to maintain the intended sense of objectivity. Alternatives such as "evaluated without bias" or "assessed impartially" can be used to express a similar meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

evaluated without bias

Replaces "tested" with "evaluated" and "objectively" with "without bias", emphasizing impartiality.

assessed impartially

Similar to the original, but uses "assessed" instead of "tested" and "impartially" instead of "objectively", stressing fairness.

verified empirically

Focuses on empirical verification, suggesting that the testing involves data and observation.

validated through rigorous methods

Emphasizes the use of strict and thorough methods for validation.

examined using quantifiable measures

Highlights the use of quantifiable measures in the examination process.

measured against concrete standards

Indicates that the testing is done against specific and measurable standards.

subjected to impartial scrutiny

Uses "scrutiny" to suggest a thorough and unbiased examination.

checked for factual accuracy

Focuses on ensuring the accuracy of facts through testing.

proven through evidence-based analysis

Highlights the use of evidence in proving the objectiveness.

investigated using standardized protocols

Emphasizes the use of standardized procedures to maintain objectivity.

FAQs

How can I use "tested objectively" in a sentence?

You can use "tested objectively" to describe a process where results are based on measurable criteria without personal bias, such as, "The software was "tested objectively" to ensure it met all performance standards".

What's the difference between "tested objectively" and "tested subjectively"?

"Tested objectively" means the evaluation is based on measurable facts and criteria, whereas "tested subjectively" means the evaluation involves personal opinions, feelings, and interpretations.

What can I say instead of "tested objectively"?

Alternatives include phrases like "evaluated without bias", "assessed impartially", or "verified empirically" depending on the context.

In what context is "tested objectively" most appropriate?

"Tested objectively" is most appropriate in scientific, academic, or professional contexts where impartial and fact-based evaluations are crucial for credibility and accuracy.