tested for errors

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "tested for errors" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to the process of checking something, such as software or data, for mistakes or issues. Example: "Before the software is released, it must be thoroughly tested for errors to ensure its reliability."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Before transfer to the user, the software should be tested for errors and for user satisfaction.

BMC Pediatrics

Most of the cloned genes had been tested for errors; only approximately 3% of them were likely to have an undetected mutation (Gelperin et al. 2005).

Genome Biology and Evolution

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

They focused on accurately testing for errors in the DNA that are linked to the blood cancers.

BBC

The microsatellite data set was tested for genotyping errors due to stuttering, short allele dominance and null alleles by means of a Monte Carlo simulation of expected allele-size differences as implemented in MICRO-CHECKER [ 39].

BMC Evolutionary Biology

The regression model was tested for specification error and goodness of fit.

BMC Infectious Diseases

The calculator may work for parameters outside these limits but has not been tested for accuracy or errors outside these limits.

Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology

Three per cent of case note review proformas and 8% of patient interviews were tested for data input errors.

British Journal of Cancer

7) Based on the second analysis, regions of interest were defined that were further tested for Mendelian consistent errors and 8) possible linkage disequilibrium was removed in SNPLINK.

BMC Cancer

After imputation, SNPs were tested for HWE, Mendelian error rate, allele frequency difference with the reference set, and imputation quality (R²).

BioMed Research International

To test for genotypic errors potentially induced by the Epstein-Barr Virus transformation process, we compared single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotype calls in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and LCL from the same individuals.

Plosone

Although we cannot test for genotyping errors, we did not observe higher rates of missing data in the markers that are out of order compared to the collinear ones (data not shown).

G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When documenting testing procedures, clearly specify the types of errors being checked for to provide context and ensure comprehensiveness.

Common error

Avoid using "tested for errors" without specifying the types of errors, this can create ambiguity. Instead, specify the types of errors being looked for, such as logical errors, syntax errors, or data entry errors.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "tested for errors" functions as a passive verb phrase, describing an action performed on a subject. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct. It's commonly used to indicate that something has undergone a process to identify and rectify mistakes.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

70%

News & Media

20%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "tested for errors" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression, as confirmed by Ludwig AI, to indicate that something has been examined for mistakes. While it appears most frequently in scientific and news contexts, it's versatile enough for general use. To enhance clarity, it's best practice to specify the types of errors being checked. Alternatives like "checked for mistakes" or "verified for accuracy" offer similar meanings, but "tested for errors" remains a direct and widely understood way to describe this process.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

error checking

Specifically refers to the procedure of identifying and documenting problems.

checked for mistakes

Focuses on identifying inaccuracies or oversights, a more general term.

error detection

Focuses on identifying the existence of flaws or irregularities.

verified for accuracy

Emphasizes confirming the correctness and precision of something.

validated for defects

Highlights the process of confirming that something is free from flaws.

examined for faults

Indicates a detailed inspection to find imperfections or shortcomings.

assessed for inaccuracies

Focuses on evaluating and identifying any lack of precision.

evaluated for problems

Highlights the overall process of judging the state of errors.

debugged

Commonly used in software contexts, implies the removal of errors.

quality control

Implies a process of monitoring to maintain expected levels of quality, by looking for errors.

FAQs

What does "tested for errors" mean?

The phrase "tested for errors" refers to the process of examining something to identify and correct any mistakes or inaccuracies. This can apply to software, data, or any other type of work product.

How can I use "tested for errors" in a sentence?

You can use "tested for errors" in a sentence like this: "Before the software is released, it must be thoroughly "tested for errors" to ensure its reliability."

What are some alternatives to "tested for errors"?

You can use alternatives like "checked for mistakes", "verified for accuracy", or "validated for defects" depending on the context.

What's the difference between "tested for errors" and "error checking"?

"Tested for errors" describes the overall process, while "error checking" is a more specific term that refers to the procedure of identifying problems. The alternative "error checking" suggests a more formal or technical procedure.