terrorist acts

USAGE SUMMARY

"terrorist acts" is a correct and usable part of a sentence in written English.
You could use it in a sentence such as: "In recent years, there has been an uptick of terrorist acts in major cities around the world."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

No terrorist acts.

The Economist

Hamas commits terrorist acts.

The New York Times

"These terrorist acts..

The Washington Post

But he will not commit terrorist acts.

The New Yorker

"He has no history of terrorist acts".

The New York Times

"These were terrorist acts," he said.

The New York Times

Then there will be no terrorist acts".

The Guardian

According to their own reports, they constantly prevent terrorist acts.

The New York Times

The emphasis today is clearly on preventing further terrorist acts.

The New Yorker

Tells about the recent terrorist acts involving airplanes.

The New Yorker

There wasn't much concern about this after earlier terrorist acts.

The Guardian - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing "terrorist acts", be specific about the context and avoid generalizations that could stereotype entire groups.

Common error

Avoid using "terrorist acts" as a blanket term for all forms of violence. Ensure the acts meet the definition of terrorism, which typically involves political motivations and targeting civilians.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "terrorist acts" functions primarily as a noun phrase. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage. It serves as the subject or object of a sentence, referring to specific actions or events.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

78%

Science

18%

Formal & Business

4%

Less common in

Academia

0.01%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "terrorist acts" is a grammatically correct and very commonly used noun phrase, as supported by Ludwig AI. It is primarily used in news and media, science, and formal business contexts to describe violent actions intended to cause fear for political, religious, or ideological reasons. While the phrase itself maintains a neutral register, the specific tone may vary based on context. When using the phrase, it is best to be specific and avoid generalizations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

acts of terrorism

Reverses the order of the words while maintaining the core meaning.

acts of terror

Shortens the phrase by using a single word ("terror") to represent the concept of terrorism.

terrorist incidents

Replaces "acts" with "incidents" to focus on specific events.

terror attacks

Uses "attacks" to emphasize the aggressive nature of the acts.

extremist violence

Employs a broader term ("extremist") to encompass a wider range of motivations behind the violent acts.

political violence

Highlights the political motivations often associated with terrorist activities.

violent extremism

Shifts the focus to the ideology driving the violent actions.

criminal acts of terror

Adds the qualifier "criminal" to underscore the illegality of the acts.

insurgent attacks

Specifies the context as acts carried out by insurgents.

guerilla warfare

Refers to the tactics used in some terrorist acts.

FAQs

How can I use "terrorist acts" in a sentence?

You can use "terrorist acts" to describe specific incidents or events, for example: "The government condemned the recent "terrorist acts" in the capital city".

What are some alternative phrases for "terrorist acts"?

Depending on the context, you might use "acts of terrorism", "terrorist incidents", or "acts of terror" as alternatives.

Is it correct to use "terrorist acts" in formal writing?

Yes, "terrorist acts" is an acceptable and grammatically correct phrase for formal writing, particularly in news reports, academic papers, and official statements.

What is the difference between "terrorist acts" and "acts of war"?

"Terrorist acts" typically target civilians for political purposes, while "acts of war" are actions between states or organized armed groups governed by international laws of war.