technically adequate

USAGE SUMMARY

'technically adequate' is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when referring to a task or process that meets the required standards, even if it is not perfect or of the highest quality. For example, "The computer program was technically adequate for our needs, even though it could have been improved."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

44 human-written examples

Performance of technically adequate manometric recordings and interpretation of the findings requires considerable background knowledge.

Nature

Technically adequate complete CDS of 177 upper extremities (UEs) of arms were reviewed.

Annals of Vascular Surgery

This new notation keeps readability and intuition, but is also technically adequate and is given a formal semantics.

Journal of Applied Logic

The staged tribute to Houston consisted of Jennifer Hudson doing a technically adequate cover of Houston's version of "I Will Always Love You," which reproduced none of the singer's exquisite control.

The New Yorker

For while Kinkade's work is at best humdrum and technically adequate, its popularity tells us something about his public, about a desperate yearning for nostalgia that pervades parts of American life, a return to the safe glow of some imagined past.

The Guardian - Arts

Moussambani had looked the part, buff and ripped as he sliced the water with a dive that looked technically adequate to the untrained eye, but as he approached the halfway turn in 40.97sec, it was painfully apparent that he was hopelessly and quite literally out of his depth.

The Guardian - Sport

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

16 human-written examples

The process of depletion of sources of natural aggregates challenges the production of technically and environmentally adequate concrete.

Construction and Building Materials

If there are large regional imbalances, shipping would be adequate technically (Denkenberger and Pearce 2014), but there would be economic and political difficulties.

International Journal of Disaster Risk Science

A BNCS/BNMS audit of quality assurance in MPS demonstrated that 81% of studies in the random sample were technically of good or adequate quality, but only 68% of reports were good or adequate.

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

Nowadays many neurosurgeons consider galea-pericranium duraplasty time-consuming, technically demanding or not adequate, thus dural surrogates are increasingly popular.

Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery

However, the findings from this study present a different experience, indicating that LGAs are suffering from a lack of adequate and technically qualified personnel.

Global Health Action

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

To avoid redundancy, if the technical context is already clear, simply using "adequate" can be sufficient. However, "technically adequate" clarifies that you are specifically assessing the technical aspects.

Common error

Avoid using "technically adequate" when describing something that is truly innovative or high-performing. The phrase implies a baseline level of acceptability, not exceptional quality. Choose stronger adjectives like "advanced", "superior", or "state-of-the-art" for truly remarkable technical achievements.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "technically adequate" functions as an adjective phrase, typically modifying a noun to indicate that something meets the minimum technical standards or requirements. It is frequently used in technical assessments and evaluations. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage in numerous contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

75%

News & Media

12%

Academia

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "technically adequate" is a versatile term used to describe something that meets the minimum technical requirements. Ludwig AI confirms that is grammatically correct and very common across diverse fields such as science, news, and academia. While it's suitable for objective assessments, avoid using it when describing outstanding achievements. Consider alternatives like "sufficiently technical" or "technically acceptable" to tailor your message. Remember, "technically adequate" implies acceptability, not excellence.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

meets technical requirements

Directly states that something satisfies the defined technical criteria.

technically satisfactory

Indicates that something satisfies requirements, even if not exceeding them.

technically acceptable

Highlights that something is accepted from a technical point of view, even if not optimal.

passes technical standards

Implies that something has been evaluated and found to be compliant with standards.

sufficiently technical

Emphasizes that something is just technical enough to meet the need.

adequately engineered

Focuses on the engineering aspect and whether it meets the minimum requirements.

functionally adequate

Focuses on whether something works well enough for its intended function.

serviceably technical

Suggests that something is adequately technical for the task at hand.

moderately technical

Indicates that something is technical to a certain degree but not overly so.

minimally compliant technically

Suggests the least amount of technical compliance is present.

FAQs

How can I use "technically adequate" in a sentence?

You can use "technically adequate" to describe something that meets the minimum technical requirements but isn't necessarily outstanding. For example, "The software was "technically adequate" for the task, but it lacked advanced features."

What are some alternatives to saying "technically adequate"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "sufficiently technical", "technically acceptable", or "functionally adequate".

Is it better to say "technically adequate" or "technically superior"?

The choice depends on the situation. "Technically superior" suggests that something is excellent and exceeds expectations, while "technically adequate" implies that it meets the basic requirements, no more, no less.

In what situations should I use "technically adequate"?

Use "technically adequate" when you want to convey that something meets a basic technical standard. This term is very fitting for describing technical procedures that might not be ideal, but sufficient. For example, describing that a biopsy was "technically adequate" even if a better technique could exist.