talent in

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "talent in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe someone's skill or ability in a specific area or field. Example: "She has a remarkable talent in painting, which she has developed over the years."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

We certainly have the talent in Britain.

The Guardian

"We need that veteran experience, leadership and talent in goal.

BBC

They also cited his talent in storytelling.

Wikipedia

That is a talent in itself.

Independent

He had some talent in Miami.

The New York Times - Sports

There's really, really good talent in Australia".

The Guardian - Film

There is real talent in there.

The Guardian - Sport

Let me put his talent in perspective.

The New York Times

Fresh talent in, up from London?

The Guardian - TV & Radio

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

2 human-written examples

"We're bringing the talent in-house".

The New York Times

We had the talent in-house before, and we should hire that talent in-house again.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "talent in" when referring to a specific area or field where someone excels. For broader abilities, consider using "skill in" or "aptitude for".

Common error

Avoid using "talent in" for skills that are primarily learned rather than naturally inclined. For purely acquired skills, phrases like "proficiency in" or "expertise in" are more appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "talent in" functions as a noun phrase, specifying a particular domain or area where someone demonstrates skill. As confirmed by Ludwig, it correctly identifies someone's proficiency or aptitude within a defined field. Examples show its applicability in diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Wiki

33%

Encyclopedias

17%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "talent in" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase to describe someone's skill or ability within a specific area, as verified by Ludwig. It is versatile and can be applied in various contexts, particularly in news, media, and encyclopedic content. When using this phrase, consider whether "skill in", "ability in", or "expertise in" might be more appropriate depending on the specific context, and avoid overgeneralizing its use to purely learned skills. Remember that while "talent in" highlights natural inclination, "skill" emphasizes proficiency acquired through practice. The phrase is applicable to multiple settings and registers from professional environments to casual conversation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

skill in

Focuses more directly on acquired proficiency or expertise.

ability in

Emphasizes the general capacity to perform a task.

expertise in

Highlights specialized knowledge and mastery.

aptitude in

Suggests a natural inclination or predisposition.

gift in

Implies an innate, exceptional ability.

knack for

Indicates an easy or effortless talent.

flair for

Suggests a distinctive and stylish talent.

competence in

Highlights the qualification of a person in a particular scope.

accomplishment in

Focuses on the result achieved with the ability.

genius in

Implies exceptional intellectual or creative power.

FAQs

How can I use "talent in" in a sentence?

You can use "talent in" to describe someone's skill or ability in a specific area or field. For example, "She has a remarkable "talent in" painting, which she has developed over the years".

What are some alternatives to "talent in"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "skill in", "ability in", or "expertise in".

Which is correct, "talent in" or "talent for"?

"Talent in" and "talent for" are both correct, but they are used in different contexts. "Talent in" is used to refer to a specific area or field, while "talent for" is used to refer to a general aptitude or inclination.

What's the difference between "skill in" and "talent in"?

"Skill in" generally refers to acquired proficiency through learning or practice, whereas "talent in" often implies a more innate or natural ability in a particular area. While they can overlap, "talent" suggests an inherent aptitude that "skill" doesn't necessarily convey.