systematically decreased

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "systematically decreased" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing a process or action that has been reduced in a methodical or organized manner over time. Example: "The company's expenses were systematically decreased to improve overall profitability."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

28 human-written examples

The vertical and horizontal displacements on those sinistral ruptures both systematically decreased toward the northwest.

Earth, Planets and Space

This systematically decreased to baseline levels during the return to Lag-0.

Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders

Functionalization of the nanozeolite surface with increasing length PEG molecules systematically decreased negative charge of the NPs.

Nanoscale Research Letters

The lattice strain anisotropy systematically decreased upon heating above 200 °C, implying a structural recovery.

Acta Materialia

Displacements on the two strands were largest (90 120 cm) at their northeastern tips, and systematically decreased toward the west (Fig. 6a).

Earth, Planets and Space

These results, which are shown in Fig. 4, indicate that listener sensitivity systematically decreased as the number of sounds in the second scene increased.

Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

32 human-written examples

Therefore, a reduced cardiac output will systematically decrease rCBF [23].

EJNMMI Research

For example, a transformation may systematically decrease toxicity or increase lipophilicity of chemical compounds.

Journal of Cheminformatics

Numerous functions f(c) were tested to find a way to systematically decrease the interval step.

Journal of the European Optical Society-Rapid Publications

On the other hand, oxygen adsorption rates during the photocurrent growth as well as decay are systematically decreases.

Nanoscale Research Letters

For elderly drivers, the average speed systematically decreases for all street types and stop time systematically increases on arterials.

Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "systematically decreased", ensure that the context clearly indicates the method or system responsible for the reduction. This adds precision and credibility to your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "systematically decreased" when the decrease is random or sporadic. "Systematically" implies a deliberate, methodical reduction, not just any decline.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "systematically decreased" functions as a verbal phrase indicating a process of methodical reduction. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and common usage in scientific and formal contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

95%

Formal & Business

3%

News & Media

2%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "systematically decreased" is a grammatically sound verbal phrase widely used to describe a methodical reduction. As Ludwig AI confirms, it commonly appears in scientific and formal contexts to denote a controlled decline. When employing this phrase, clarity is key; ensure the context reveals the system or method behind the reduction. Alternatives like "consistently decreased" or "methodically reduced" can offer subtle variations in emphasis. Understanding the scope of "systematically" is crucial to avoid misapplication. This makes "systematically decreased" suitable for precise and technical writing where planned and measured declines are discussed.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

consistently decreased

Replaces "systematically" with "consistently", emphasizing the regularity of the decrease.

methodically reduced

Replaces "systematically" with "methodically", stressing the organized approach to reduction.

steadily declined

Substitutes "decreased" with "declined", suggesting a gradual reduction over time.

gradually diminished

Employs "gradually" instead of "systematically", highlighting the incremental nature of the reduction; "diminished" replaces "decreased".

progressively lessened

Uses "progressively" to convey a step-by-step reduction, and "lessened" in place of "decreased".

uniformly decreased

Substitutes "systematically" with "uniformly", indicating a consistent rate of reduction.

regularly attenuated

Uses "regularly" for "systematically" and "attenuated" for "decreased", implying a weakening or reduction in force.

invariably shrunk

Replaces "systematically decreased" with "invariably shrunk", implying a consistent contraction or reduction in size.

predictably lessened

Employs "predictably" instead of "systematically", suggesting that the decrease was expected or followed a pattern; "lessened" replaces "decreased".

conventionally reduced

Replaces "systematically" with "conventionally", stressing that the decrease follows tradition and replaces "decreased" with "reduced".

FAQs

How can I use "systematically decreased" in a sentence?

Use "systematically decreased" to describe a methodical reduction. For example, "The company "systematically decreased" its carbon footprint through energy-efficient upgrades".

What are some alternatives to "systematically decreased"?

Alternatives include "consistently decreased", "steadily declined", or "methodically reduced", depending on the specific context and emphasis you want to convey.

Is it redundant to say "systematically decreased gradually"?

Yes, adding "gradually" to "systematically decreased" can be redundant. "Systematically" already implies a methodical and often gradual process, so "gradually" may be unnecessary.

What is the difference between "systematically decreased" and "randomly decreased"?

"Systematically decreased" implies a deliberate and methodical reduction, while "randomly decreased" suggests a reduction without any discernible pattern or method. They are opposites.