Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
systematically compared
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "systematically compared" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a methodical approach to analyzing or evaluating two or more items, subjects, or data sets. Example: "The results of the study were systematically compared to previous research findings to identify trends."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Alternative expressions(5)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
A study published in 2011 has systematically compared these European skeletons, using rigorous criteria for bone diagnosis and dating.
News & Media
The experimental results were systematically compared to relevant studies.
Science
But no one had ever systematically compared bacterial colonies from different areas on the human body.
Science & Research
Edison et al. systematically compared 11C-PiB PET and MRI in AD, MCI patients, and controls.
Science
Results in terms of pressure distributions statistics are analyzed and systematically compared to experimental data.
Science
To date the neural systems controlling sensory and reward anticipation have not been systematically compared.
Science
The performance of this reactor was systematically compared to the corresponding conventional fixed bed reactor.
Science
Therefore, we systematically compared the linear scission model with the newly proposed 'topological scission' model.
Science
We systematically compared two strategies for isolating liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSEC) from mouse liver.
Their solubility in aqueous system, cancer cell uptaken ability and photodynamic activities were also systematically compared.
These four algorithms are exhaustively tested and the results are systematically compared.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "systematically compared", ensure your methodology for comparison is clearly defined and replicable. State the criteria used for comparison to maintain transparency and rigor.
Common error
Avoid using "systematically compared" without specifying how the comparison was conducted. The phrase implies a structured approach, so failing to detail the criteria or methods used weakens your argument and reduces credibility.
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "systematically compared" functions as a verb phrase typically used to describe a rigorous, methodical examination of similarities and differences between two or more entities. Ludwig examples show its common use in scientific and academic contexts.
Frequent in
Science
100%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Academia
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "systematically compared" is a verb phrase indicating a methodical and rigorous comparison, predominantly used in scientific and academic writing. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread use. To effectively use the phrase, ensure the methodology and criteria for comparison are well-defined. Common errors include failing to specify how the comparison was conducted. Alternatives include "methodically assessed" or "carefully contrasted", depending on the specific context. The phrase conveys objectivity and thoroughness, enhancing the credibility of the analysis.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
carefully contrasted
Directly emphasizes the contrasting aspect of the comparison.
methodically assessed
Replaces "compared" with "assessed", emphasizing evaluation rather than direct comparison.
rigorously evaluated
Emphasizes the strictness and thoroughness of the evaluation process.
thoroughly analyzed
Focuses on the depth and detail of the analysis performed.
comprehensively examined
Highlights the completeness of the examination.
analytically differentiated
Focuses on identifying the differences through analysis.
closely inspected
Emphasizes careful and detailed observation.
empirically tested
Emphasizes testing using data or observations.
scientifically validated
Highlights validation through scientific methods.
statistically correlated
Focuses on finding statistical relationships.
FAQs
How can I use "systematically compared" in a sentence?
You can use "systematically compared" to describe a careful and methodical comparison between two or more things. For example: "The data from both experiments were "systematically compared" to identify any significant differences."
What is a good alternative to "systematically compared"?
Alternatives include "methodically assessed", "carefully contrasted", or "thoroughly analyzed". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.
What does "systematically" imply when using "systematically compared"?
Using "systematically" implies that the comparison was conducted using a pre-defined, organized, and repeatable process. This suggests a rigorous and objective approach, enhancing the credibility of the comparison.
Is there a difference between "systematically compared" and "generally compared"?
Yes. "Generally compared" suggests a casual or broad comparison without a specific method. In contrast, ""systematically compared"" implies a structured, detailed, and methodical approach to the comparison.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested