supported with

USAGE SUMMARY

"supported with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that is backed up with evidence, ideas, information, etc. Example sentence: The research paper was well-structured and supported with evidence from multiple sources.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

ESU supported with study design help.

Stanford University

*IE 11 is supported with Compatibility mode.

Stanford University

The discussion is supported with illustrations.

Motor Vehicle

Our conclusions are supported with simulations results.

Computer Communications

Skills training could also be supported with more money.

The Guardian - Business

Opinions should be clearly supported with facts gathered during class.

The New York Times

All the nodes were supported with 100% BP.

Nature

The project is supported with an Engaged Curriculum Grant.

Cornell University

Coleoptera excluding Archostemata are supported with a high Bremer support.

Harvard University

MATLAB simulations supported with experimental study are used.

ISA Transactions

Finally, the theoretical results are supported with an application.

Biosystems

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "supported with", ensure that the supporting element is clearly and directly relevant to the statement or claim being made. This enhances the credibility and clarity of your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "supported with" when the evidence or information provided is weak or tangential. Overstating the level of support can undermine your argument and credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "supported with" functions as a prepositional phrase modifying a verb or noun, indicating that something is being reinforced, validated, or strengthened by additional information, evidence, or resources. Ludwig's examples show its versatility across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

41%

Academia

20%

News & Media

17%

Less common in

Formal & Business

12%

Wiki

2%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "supported with" is a versatile and grammatically sound construction used to indicate that a statement, claim, or idea is being reinforced or validated by evidence or resources. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability in written English. Its prevalence in academic, scientific, and news contexts underscores its importance in formal and evidence-based communication. When employing this phrase, clarity and relevance are key to bolstering credibility. Common errors include overstating the level of support or using weak evidence. By understanding these nuances, writers can effectively use "supported with" to strengthen their arguments and enhance their overall communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

backed by

This alternative emphasizes the idea of having a solid foundation or resources.

reinforced by

This alternative highlights the strengthening effect that the support provides.

accompanied by

This alternative focuses on the idea of something being present together with something else.

substantiated by

This alternative implies that something is proven or verified by the accompanying element.

underpinned by

This alternative suggests a fundamental basis or foundation.

bolstered by

This alternative emphasizes the idea of boosting or strengthening something.

buttressed by

This alternative conveys the sense of providing strong support to prevent collapse.

fortified by

This alternative suggests strengthening and protecting something.

validated by

This alternative means to confirm the truth or accuracy of something.

grounded in

This alternative indicates that something has its origin or basis in something else.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "supported with" in a sentence?

Use "supported with" to indicate that a claim, argument, or idea is strengthened or validated by evidence, data, or other forms of backing. For example, "The hypothesis is "supported with" empirical data."

What are some alternatives to "supported with"?

You can use alternatives like "backed by", "reinforced by", or "substantiated by" depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is there a difference between "supported with" and "backed by"?

While both phrases indicate that something is being strengthened or validated, "backed by" often suggests a stronger, more fundamental form of support than ""supported with"". "Supported with" can imply a broader range of supporting elements, not necessarily foundational.

When should I not use "supported with"?

Avoid using "supported with" when the evidence is weak, irrelevant, or doesn't genuinely strengthen the point you're making. In such cases, it's better to use a more nuanced phrase or omit the reference to support altogether.