sufficient evidence for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "sufficient evidence for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the adequacy of evidence to support a claim, argument, or conclusion. Example: "The researchers presented sufficient evidence for their hypothesis, leading to a significant breakthrough in the study."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

That seems to me, at least, to be more than sufficient evidence for all of us.

The New Yorker

This, a federal appeals court held, did not constitute sufficient evidence for discrimination.

The New York Times - Magazine

Consequently, the court ruled that the government had not provided sufficient evidence for its contentions.

The New Yorker

Comey's statement is sufficient evidence for an obstruction of justice case.

The Washington Post

Have the Authors provided sufficient evidence for the claims they are making?

Yale University

For a person to be detained there must be sufficient evidence for a judge to issue an arrest warrant.

The New York Times

That was sufficient evidence for Cas, who "promptly and unanimously cleared Armitstead of the asserted missed test".

The Guardian - Sport

Watkin's solicitors clearly believe they have sufficient evidence for the case to be committed to trial here.

The Guardian - Opinion

I thought there was sufficient evidence for the jury to find otherwise".

The New York Times

There is sufficient evidence for the need and utilization of an ASBHI program in this community.

Journal of Pediatric Health Care

It also had in tow an MI5 lawyer to advise when they had acquired sufficient evidence for a court case.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "sufficient evidence for", ensure that the evidence you are referring to is directly relevant and clearly supports the claim or argument you are making. Provide specific details or examples to strengthen your case.

Common error

Avoid using "sufficient evidence for" when the evidence is weak, circumstantial, or open to interpretation. Overstating the evidence can damage your credibility and weaken your argument. Be realistic about the strength of the evidence.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "sufficient evidence for" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun, indicating that there is an adequate amount of proof or support for something. This construction is frequently used to assert the validity of a claim or argument, as confirmed by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

38%

Science

34%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Wiki

4%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "sufficient evidence for" is a commonly used prepositional phrase indicating that there is enough proof or support for a claim. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread usage. It's frequently found in news, scientific, and academic contexts, conveying a neutral to formal tone. When employing this phrase, ensure your evidence is relevant and strong. Alternatives like "adequate proof of" or "enough data to support" may be suitable depending on the context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

adequate proof of

Replaces "evidence" with "proof" and "for" with "of", emphasizing the conclusive nature of the support.

enough data to support

Replaces "evidence" with "data", suitable when discussing research or analytical findings. It also uses a different prepositional phrase, 'to support'.

ample justification for

Substitutes "evidence" with "justification", focusing on the reasoning or basis for an action or belief.

reasonable grounds for

Emphasizes the logical basis for something, using "grounds" instead of "evidence".

compelling basis for

Highlights the convincing nature of the support, replacing "evidence" with "basis".

substantial support for

Focuses on the strength and amount of backing available.

sound foundation for

Implies a solid and reliable basis, changing "evidence" to "foundation".

demonstrable basis for

Highlights that the basis can be shown or proven.

strong indicators of

Replaces "evidence" with "indicators", often used when suggesting a likely outcome or condition.

verifiable rationale for

Emphasizes that the rationale or reason can be checked and confirmed.

FAQs

How can I use "sufficient evidence for" in a sentence?

You can use "sufficient evidence for" to indicate that there is enough proof or support for a particular claim or argument. For example: "The data provides "sufficient evidence for" the hypothesis."

What are some alternatives to saying "sufficient evidence for"?

Alternatives include "adequate proof of", "enough data to support", or "ample justification for", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "sufficient evidence for" or "enough evidence for"?

"Sufficient evidence for" and "enough evidence for" are largely interchangeable. "Sufficient" often implies a more formal or legalistic context, while "enough" is generally more informal.

What does it mean when someone says there isn't "sufficient evidence for" something?

It means that the available information or proof is not strong enough to support a particular conclusion or belief. It indicates a lack of convincing evidence.