Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

substantiated with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'substantiated with' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you have evidence to support a statement, for example: "The claim that the painting is an original was substantiated with the artist's signature on the back of the canvas."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

These principles are substantiated with a series of examples.

Neither, however, has so far been substantiated with proof.

Encyclopedias

Britannica

Finally, the analytical design are substantiated with numerical results.

The theoretical results are substantiated with numerical examples.

The test results are substantiated with numerical parametric analysis.

The proposed framework is substantiated with several numerical tests.

Theoretical assessment is substantiated with the help of experiments.

Everything depends on how well each of those arguments can be substantiated with specific evidence.

News & Media

The New York Times

The results obtained from these analytical techniques are substantiated with the results of TG-DTA.

Its overblown rhetoric has muddied the waters, and allegations of widespread "rorting" were not substantiated with evidence.

These mechanisms have been substantiated with scanning electron microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "substantiated with", ensure the evidence you cite is directly relevant and clearly supports the claim you are making. Avoid using it for tangential or weak support.

Common error

Avoid using "substantiated with" when the evidence is preliminary or inconclusive. Reserve it for situations where the support is strong and convincing.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "substantiated with" functions as a linking phrase, connecting a statement or claim to the evidence that supports it. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and usability. It indicates that something has been proven or supported by concrete evidence. Examples from Ludwig highlight its use in academic, scientific, and news contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

64%

News & Media

22%

Academia

5%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Encyclopedias

2%

Formal & Business

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "substantiated with" is a phrase used to indicate that a claim or statement is supported by evidence. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used across different contexts. It's most frequently found in scientific, academic, and news sources, highlighting its use in formal writing. When using this phrase, ensure that the evidence is directly relevant and strong enough to support the claim. Alternatives like ""supported by"" or ""backed up by"" can be used depending on the context.

FAQs

How can I use "substantiated with" in a sentence?

You can use "substantiated with" to show that a statement or claim is supported by evidence. For example, "The theory was "substantiated with" experimental data."

What are some alternatives to "substantiated with"?

Some alternatives to "substantiated with" include "supported by", "backed up by", or "corroborated by".

Is it better to say "substantiated by" or "substantiated with"?

"Substantiated with" and "substantiated by" are both acceptable, but "substantiated with" emphasizes the specific evidence used, while "substantiated by" is more general.

What kind of evidence can "substantiate" a claim?

Evidence can include experimental data, expert opinions, historical records, or any other information that supports the truth or validity of a claim. It needs to be relevant and strong to be used with ""substantiated with"".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: