Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

substantiate with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "substantiate with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you need to show evidence to support a claim. For example, "The report substantiates the hypothesis with detailed data from the experiments."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

We aim to substantiate, with objective arguments, potential advantages of Billroth I simple reconstruction versus Billroth I with semifundoplication.

We then substantiate with realistic resonant structures designed using graphene nano-ribbons by employing a tight binding framework with edge correction that match density functional theory calculations under the local density approximation.

However, we were unable to see any FGFR1 amplification in small tumours (T1); therefore this hypothesis is difficult to substantiate with our results.

With respect to particular parameters, the results obtained with the Erasmus Ladder can be comparable to those of other tests, but its precise quantification of a wide range of parameters can still reveal additional phenotypes that are hard to substantiate with more classic methods (e.g., Galliano et al. 2013a, b).

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

Neither, however, has so far been substantiated with proof.

Encyclopedias

Britannica

These principles are substantiated with a series of examples.

The test results are substantiated with numerical parametric analysis.

The theoretical results are substantiated with numerical examples.

Finally, the analytical design are substantiated with numerical results.

The proposed framework is substantiated with several numerical tests.

Theoretical assessment is substantiated with the help of experiments.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "substantiate with", ensure that the evidence you provide is directly relevant and clearly supports the claim you are making. Vague or tangentially related evidence weakens your argument.

Common error

Avoid using anecdotal evidence or personal opinions to "substantiate with". Instead, focus on empirical data, expert opinions, and verifiable facts to strengthen your argument.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.3/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "substantiate with" functions as a verb phrase indicating the action of providing evidence or proof to support a claim. It highlights the process of making something credible or valid through concrete support. Ludwig confirms its proper usage.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

25%

Academia

25%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "substantiate with" is a grammatically correct and usable phrase, though relatively rare in occurrence. As Ludwig AI explains, it is most commonly used in scientific and academic writing to denote the action of providing evidence to support a claim. When employing this phrase, ensure that the evidence is relevant and strengthens your argument. Consider alternatives like "corroborate with" or "support with evidence" to add variety to your writing.

FAQs

How can I use "substantiate with" in a sentence?

You can use "substantiate with" to indicate that you are providing evidence or proof to support a claim, such as: "The scientist aimed to substantiate the hypothesis with experimental data."

What is an alternative to "substantiate with"?

Alternatives include "corroborate with", "support with evidence", or "validate with data", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "substantiate with evidence" or just "substantiate"?

While "substantiate" alone implies providing evidence, "substantiate with evidence" can add emphasis and clarity, especially when specifying the type of support being offered. However, avoid redundancy by ensuring the "evidence" is clearly presented.

How does "substantiate with" differ from "support"?

"Support" is a broader term. While you can "support" a claim with various means (including emotional or logical arguments), "substantiate with" specifically refers to providing factual or empirical evidence to prove the validity of something.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.3/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: