Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
substantially inaccurate
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "substantially inaccurate" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe information or statements that are significantly incorrect or misleading. Example: "The report was found to be substantially inaccurate, leading to a reevaluation of the project's outcomes."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
4 human-written examples
In 2009, when a fire at a home in the Adirondacks killed four residents, an investigation showed that the home's fire drill reports were "substantially inaccurate," and "contained serious irregularities which called into question the veracity of the drills".
News & Media
A substantially inaccurate algorithm can create outliers impacting on overall recognition accuracy.
For many of the parameter combinations considered later, selection becomes very weak and approximations (5a) and (5b) are substantially inaccurate.
Science
These may generate substantially inaccurate results but in this context this has little detrimental effect on decision-making.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
55 human-written examples
It was first published on 14 July 2011 and was substantially revised to remove inaccurate details of the law relating to data protection.
News & Media
The consequences for structural design and testing are that two key design parameters, natural frequency and damping, vary depending on the magnitude of vibration, and that parameters measured during in-situ testing of structures may be inaccurate for substantially different loads.
Science
Some simulation studies show that selecting only the top animals may lead to substantially biased [ 31] and inaccurate predictions [ 32].
In fact, this scaling group becomes inaccurate as the viscosity ratio is substantially reduced.
However, directly measuring the concentration of nutrients within cells is inaccurate, expensive, destructive, and time-consuming, substantially impairing our ability to model growth rates in nutrient-limited phytoplankton populations.
Secondly, the limited literature quantity, which partly comes from inaccurate definitions of PHI, is devoted substantially to the heterogeneities between studies.
Defining splicing graphs based on RNA-Seq data entails the additional difficulty that inaccurate or ambiguous read alignments can substantially increase the size of these graphs.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Avoid using "substantially inaccurate" in contexts where a more precise term like "misleading" or "erroneous" would be more appropriate.
Common error
Be cautious about using "substantially inaccurate" when the inaccuracy is minor or negligible. This can lead to misinterpretations and credibility issues.
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "substantially inaccurate" functions as a descriptor, modifying a noun to indicate a significant deviation from accuracy. As confirmed by Ludwig, it is grammatically correct and usable. It emphasizes the magnitude of the inaccuracy.
Frequent in
Science
40%
News & Media
40%
Formal & Business
20%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "substantially inaccurate" is a grammatically sound and usable descriptor, indicating a significant level of inaccuracy. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is correct. It is most commonly found in scientific and news contexts, suggesting a neutral to formal register. When using the phrase, it's crucial to ensure that the inaccuracy is indeed significant and provable. Alternatives such as "significantly incorrect" or "largely untrue" can be used depending on the specific context.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
significantly incorrect
This alternative emphasizes the degree of inaccuracy, similar to the original phrase.
largely untrue
This alternative focuses on the truthfulness aspect, implying a significant deviation from facts.
considerably flawed
This alternative highlights the presence of significant defects or shortcomings.
grossly mistaken
This suggests a large and obvious error, similar to "substantially inaccurate".
majorly imprecise
This alternative emphasizes the lack of precision in the information.
highly erroneous
This term is more formal and emphasizes the error-filled nature of the information.
materially incorrect
This suggests the inaccuracy is significant and relevant to the matter at hand.
seriously wrong
This highlights the severity of the inaccuracy.
wildly off
This is a more informal way to express a large degree of inaccuracy.
far from accurate
This alternative emphasizes the distance from being accurate.
FAQs
How can I use "substantially inaccurate" in a sentence?
You can use "substantially inaccurate" to describe reports, data, or statements that contain significant errors. For example: "The initial report was found to be "substantially inaccurate", requiring a thorough revision."
What are some alternatives to saying "substantially inaccurate"?
Alternatives include "significantly incorrect", "largely untrue", or "considerably flawed", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is there a difference between "inaccurate" and "substantially inaccurate"?
"Inaccurate" simply means not accurate, while "substantially inaccurate" implies a significant degree of inaccuracy. The latter suggests a more serious deviation from the truth.
When is it appropriate to use "substantially inaccurate" instead of "slightly inaccurate"?
Use "substantially inaccurate" when the errors or deviations are significant enough to potentially mislead or impact decisions. "Slightly inaccurate" is more suitable for minor discrepancies that do not significantly alter the overall meaning or outcome.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested