Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

substantially inaccurate

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "substantially inaccurate" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe information or statements that are significantly incorrect or misleading. Example: "The report was found to be substantially inaccurate, leading to a reevaluation of the project's outcomes."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

In 2009, when a fire at a home in the Adirondacks killed four residents, an investigation showed that the home's fire drill reports were "substantially inaccurate," and "contained serious irregularities which called into question the veracity of the drills".

News & Media

The New York Times

A substantially inaccurate algorithm can create outliers impacting on overall recognition accuracy.

For many of the parameter combinations considered later, selection becomes very weak and approximations (5a) and (5b) are substantially inaccurate.

These may generate substantially inaccurate results but in this context this has little detrimental effect on decision-making.

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

It was first published on 14 July 2011 and was substantially revised to remove inaccurate details of the law relating to data protection.

News & Media

The Guardian

The consequences for structural design and testing are that two key design parameters, natural frequency and damping, vary depending on the magnitude of vibration, and that parameters measured during in-situ testing of structures may be inaccurate for substantially different loads.

Some simulation studies show that selecting only the top animals may lead to substantially biased [ 31] and inaccurate predictions [ 32].

In fact, this scaling group becomes inaccurate as the viscosity ratio is substantially reduced.

However, directly measuring the concentration of nutrients within cells is inaccurate, expensive, destructive, and time-consuming, substantially impairing our ability to model growth rates in nutrient-limited phytoplankton populations.

Secondly, the limited literature quantity, which partly comes from inaccurate definitions of PHI, is devoted substantially to the heterogeneities between studies.

Defining splicing graphs based on RNA-Seq data entails the additional difficulty that inaccurate or ambiguous read alignments can substantially increase the size of these graphs.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "substantially inaccurate" in contexts where a more precise term like "misleading" or "erroneous" would be more appropriate.

Common error

Be cautious about using "substantially inaccurate" when the inaccuracy is minor or negligible. This can lead to misinterpretations and credibility issues.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "substantially inaccurate" functions as a descriptor, modifying a noun to indicate a significant deviation from accuracy. As confirmed by Ludwig, it is grammatically correct and usable. It emphasizes the magnitude of the inaccuracy.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "substantially inaccurate" is a grammatically sound and usable descriptor, indicating a significant level of inaccuracy. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is correct. It is most commonly found in scientific and news contexts, suggesting a neutral to formal register. When using the phrase, it's crucial to ensure that the inaccuracy is indeed significant and provable. Alternatives such as "significantly incorrect" or "largely untrue" can be used depending on the specific context.

FAQs

How can I use "substantially inaccurate" in a sentence?

You can use "substantially inaccurate" to describe reports, data, or statements that contain significant errors. For example: "The initial report was found to be "substantially inaccurate", requiring a thorough revision."

What are some alternatives to saying "substantially inaccurate"?

Alternatives include "significantly incorrect", "largely untrue", or "considerably flawed", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is there a difference between "inaccurate" and "substantially inaccurate"?

"Inaccurate" simply means not accurate, while "substantially inaccurate" implies a significant degree of inaccuracy. The latter suggests a more serious deviation from the truth.

When is it appropriate to use "substantially inaccurate" instead of "slightly inaccurate"?

Use "substantially inaccurate" when the errors or deviations are significant enough to potentially mislead or impact decisions. "Slightly inaccurate" is more suitable for minor discrepancies that do not significantly alter the overall meaning or outcome.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: