substantial risks

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "substantial risks" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing significant potential dangers or threats in various contexts, such as finance, health, or safety. Example: "Investing in volatile markets can expose you to substantial risks that may affect your financial stability."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

But others are substantial risks.

The New York Times

Warfare on this scale carries substantial risks.

The New York Times

Those rewards reflect the substantial risks.

The New York Times

Many analysts suspect it faces substantial risks on those deals.

The New York Times

These efforts come with substantial risks for Republicans.

The New York Times

Each one involves substantial risks that executives must manage.

Harvard Business Review

But going negative so early also carries substantial risks.

The New York Times

It emphasized that such purchases could carry "substantial risks".

The New York Times

They generally offer little or no benefit while imposing substantial risks.

The Guardian - Opinion

"The thrill of exploring limits and taking substantial risks no longer existed.

The New York Times

He had to take substantial risks to get 11 able-bodied players on to the pitch.

The Guardian - Sport

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing potential problems, use "substantial risks" to underscore the significance of the possible negative outcomes. For example, 'Investing in this venture carries "substantial risks" due to market volatility.'

Common error

Avoid using "substantial risks" when discussing minor inconveniences or negligible possibilities. This phrase is best reserved for situations where the potential negative impact is significant.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "substantial risks" functions as a noun phrase that serves to identify and emphasize the significant dangers or hazards associated with a particular situation, activity, or decision. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is valid for English writing.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

52%

Science

24%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6%

Wiki

2%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "substantial risks" is a commonly used and grammatically correct phrase to highlight significant potential dangers or hazards. Analysis of various sources and Ludwig AI's assessment affirm its validity and wide applicability across contexts like news, science, and academia. When aiming to emphasize the potential for negative outcomes, consider using "substantial risks", and keep in mind that similar phrases include "significant dangers" or "considerable hazards". It's best suited for professional or formal contexts and should be reserved for situations involving considerably negative impacts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

significant dangers

Emphasizes the importance and potential impact of the risks involved.

considerable hazards

Highlights the presence of notable dangers or potential harm.

major threats

Focuses on the potential for harm or damage from specific sources.

serious perils

Emphasizes the potential for severe and immediate danger.

notable exposures

Highlights vulnerability and potential for negative impacts.

significant liabilities

Focuses on potential financial or legal burdens arising from risks.

marked vulnerabilities

Emphasizes weaknesses or susceptibility to harm.

appreciable downsides

Highlights the potential negative consequences or disadvantages.

material exposures

Emphasizes the significance and relevance of potential risks.

considerable uncertainties

Focuses on unpredictable factors that could lead to negative outcomes.

FAQs

How can I use "substantial risks" in a sentence?

You can use "substantial risks" to highlight significant potential dangers. For example: 'The project involves "substantial risks" due to unforeseen circumstances.'

What are some alternatives to "substantial risks"?

Alternatives include "significant dangers", "considerable hazards", or "major threats" depending on the specific context.

Is it appropriate to use "substantial risks" in informal conversation?

While grammatically correct, "substantial risks" is more suited for formal or professional contexts. In informal conversation, simpler terms like "big risks" or "serious dangers" might be more appropriate.

What's the difference between "substantial risks" and "potential risks"?

"Potential risks" refers to any possible risks, while "substantial risks" implies that the potential risks are significant in magnitude or impact. Thus, "substantial risks" indicates a higher level of concern than "potential risks".