substantial losses

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "substantial losses" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe significant reductions in value, quantity, or profit, often in a financial or business context. Example: "The company reported substantial losses in the last quarter due to decreased sales and increased operational costs."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"We have suffered substantial losses".

The New York Times - Sports

Both companies suffered substantial losses.

Harvard Business Review

before they could cause substantial losses.

University of California, Berkeley

Lions breed rapidly, however, and populations can tolerate substantial losses.

University of California, Berkeley

such violation directly or indirectly resulted in substantial losses or created a significant risk of substantial losses to other persons.

Cornell University

First, there is the possibility of substantial losses on Friday.

The Guardian - Business

Because they got in late, they have substantial losses.

The New York Times

"City Link has incurred substantial losses over several years.

The Guardian - Business

WHAT remained surprisingly resilient since 2007, despite the substantial losses?

The New York Times

Defaults rose sharply, and there have been substantial losses.

The New York Times

If the funds hold large positions in the asset this can cause substantial losses.

Yale University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "substantial losses", ensure the context clearly defines what is being lost, whether it's financial assets, market share, or natural resources. Specificity enhances clarity.

Common error

While "substantial losses" is a correct phrase, it's best suited for formal or professional writing. In casual conversation, consider simpler alternatives like "big losses" or "major setbacks" to maintain a natural tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "substantial losses" functions primarily as a noun phrase where the adjective "substantial" modifies the noun "losses". It indicates a significant or considerable amount of loss, whether in a financial, physical, or abstract sense. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage and wide applicability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Academia

28%

Science

24%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

4%

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "substantial losses" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to denote significant detriments or reductions. As Ludwig AI indicates, it is applicable across various formal contexts, including news, academia, and science. While simpler alternatives exist for informal communication, "substantial losses" offers a precise and impactful way to convey the severity of a loss. Its prevalence in authoritative sources like The New York Times and The Guardian underscores its reliability and appropriateness for professional and academic writing. Be mindful of the context to ensure the phrase aligns with the desired tone and level of formality.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

marked reductions

"Reductions" provides a more direct synonym for losses, while "marked" is similar to substantial, resulting in a nearly interchangeable phrase.

considerable deficits

"Deficits" focuses on the shortfall aspect, particularly in financial contexts, maintaining a high degree of semantic similarity.

significant setbacks

Replaces "losses" with a broader term, emphasizing hindrance or obstacle, which is similar but less specific.

severe revenue declines

Specifically refers to reduced income, maintaining a close relationship to the original phrase within a business context.

heavy financial blows

Uses a more metaphorical expression indicating severe financial damage, somewhat altering the tone.

serious economic damage

Focuses on the damaging effect, rather than the loss itself, slightly altering the emphasis.

major economic downturn

Shifts the focus to the economic environment causing the loss, providing a broader context.

significant financial burden

Highlights the financial strain resulting from the losses, shifting the perspective to the impact.

notable diminutions

Uses a more formal term for reduction, suitable for academic or official contexts.

large scale financial impact

Focuses on the financial repercussions and its magnitude, providing a more descriptive and extended phrase.

FAQs

How can I use "substantial losses" in a sentence?

"Substantial losses" typically refers to a significant reduction in value or quantity. For example, "The company reported "substantial losses" due to the economic downturn."

What are some alternatives to "substantial losses"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "significant setbacks", "considerable deficits", or "heavy financial blows".

Is it more appropriate to say "substantial losses" or "significant losses"?

Both "substantial losses" and "significant losses" are correct and often interchangeable. "Substantial" implies a considerable amount, while "significant" emphasizes importance or impact. Choose the word that best fits the specific context.

In what contexts is it most appropriate to use the phrase "substantial losses"?

The phrase "substantial losses" is most appropriate in formal contexts, such as financial reports, academic papers, and news articles, where precision and a serious tone are required.