substantial hazard

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "substantial hazard" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a significant risk or danger associated with a particular situation or condition. Example: "The construction site poses a substantial hazard to workers due to the lack of safety measures in place."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

On top of it all she ends up caught in a diplomatic controversy with the International Federation of Judo banning her hijab last Thursday – a ban that makes little sense since the Asian Federation allows it and few judokas see any substantial hazard.

The Guardian - Opinion

"The question is whether that one phone represents a substantial hazard to the public," said Bill Kitzes, a product-safety expert and former program manager with the Consumer Product Safety Commission.

Los Angeles Times

Similarly, in the United States, humans have acquired monkeypox infection from pet prairie dogs, which had themselves been infected by exotic African rodents (15 ); these findings show that exotic pets represent a substantial hazard.

Emerging Infectious Diseases

The magnitude of the protection reported by Rebbeck et al [ 7] is substantial (hazard ratio of 0.53) and increased with increasing duration of follow up after the prophylactic surgery.

Breast Cancer Research

Herndon and the FDA should seriously consider what the late Philip Handler said about balancing risks and benefits: A sensible guide would surely be to reduce exposure to hazard whenever possible, to accept substantial hazard only for great benefit, minor hazard for modest benefit, and no hazard at all when the benefit seems relatively trivial.

Environmental Health Perspectives

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

David Utterback, a coordinator for the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, which makes recommendations for worker safety regulations for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, lamented that even facilities with prior violations are allowed to operate with potential substantial hazards.

Huffington Post

Once they realized the extent and systemic nature of their crisis, they acted decisively, with clarity and with thoughtful consideration of the fact that their actions could create substantial moral hazard and add to systemic risk if they didn't adhere to certain common-sense principles.

Forbes

"There is a very substantial moral hazard in that".

The Guardian

In 2011, the commission created mandatory rules for the clothes, which called the drawstrings a substantial product hazard.

The New York Times

And second, if there isn't, what steps need to be taken to rein in the substantial moral hazard problem that will therefore result?

The Economist

It created substantial moral hazard problems and brought risks of its own, including taxpayer exposure to large bank losses and corruption concerns.After the dust settled, Congress set to work devising new banking rules designed to ensure that in the future too-big-to-fail banks could be allowed to fail.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing potential risks in safety reports or guidelines, use "substantial hazard" to clearly communicate the severity of a dangerous condition.

Common error

Avoid using "substantial hazard" when the risk is minimal or easily mitigated. Overstating the danger can undermine the credibility of your assessment.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "substantial hazard" functions primarily as a noun phrase, where "substantial" modifies the noun "hazard". It highlights the significant degree or extent of the hazard. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, this phrase is suitable for describing significant risks.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "substantial hazard" is a grammatically sound and usable expression in English, primarily functioning to denote a significant risk or danger. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and applicability across various contexts, especially in formal settings like safety reports and scientific studies. While not exceedingly common, it effectively conveys the severity of a potential threat, making it a valuable term for risk communication. Alternatives include "significant danger" and "considerable risk". When using this phrase, ensure that the described hazard genuinely poses a considerable threat to maintain credibility.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

significant danger

Replaces "substantial hazard" with synonyms that emphasize the gravity of the risk.

considerable risk

Uses "considerable" instead of "substantial", highlighting the significance of the risk involved.

major threat

Focuses on the threatening aspect of the hazard, replacing "substantial" with "major".

serious peril

Emphasizes the potential for harm, using "serious peril" instead of "substantial hazard".

significant jeopardy

Highlights the element of danger, replacing "hazard" with "jeopardy".

notable danger

Uses "notable" to underscore the prominence of the danger.

marked hazard

Indicates that the hazard is easily noticeable or apparent.

significant risk factor

Focuses on the contribution to overall risk, suited for scientific or medical contexts.

material danger

Uses "material" to suggest the danger is concrete and impactful.

severe threat

Replaces both words for a slightly stronger emphasis on the intensity of the threat.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "substantial hazard" in a sentence?

Use "substantial hazard" to describe situations where the risk is significant and could lead to serious consequences. For example, "The lack of safety protocols poses a "substantial hazard" to workers."

What are some alternatives to "substantial hazard"?

You can use alternatives like "significant danger", "considerable risk", or "major threat" depending on the specific context.

Is it appropriate to use "substantial hazard" in formal writing?

Yes, "substantial hazard" is suitable for formal writing, especially in contexts such as safety reports, legal documents, and scientific papers where precise and clear communication of risk is essential.

What is the difference between "substantial hazard" and "minor hazard"?

"Substantial hazard" indicates a significant risk with potentially severe consequences, while "minor hazard" refers to a less serious risk that poses minimal threat.