substantial grounds for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "substantial grounds for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a basis or justification for a belief, action, or decision, often in legal or formal contexts. Example: "The committee found substantial grounds for the appeal, leading to a review of the case."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

26 human-written examples

A similar investigation in the United States was dropped by the Federal Trade Commission in September 2000 after it, too, found no substantial grounds for complaints.

The New York Times

These laws also prohibit the U.S. government from extraditing non-nationals to third countries where there are "substantial grounds for believing" that they would be tortured.

The New Yorker

District judge John Zani said there were "substantial grounds" for believing Arronategui would not voluntarily return to custody and no application for bail was made.

The Guardian

The last of them almost certainly violates the Convention's ban on sending anyone to a country "where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture".

The New Yorker

It says member states may not transfer asylum seekers when there are "substantial grounds for believing that the asylum seeker would face a real risk of being subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment".

The Guardian

The international Convention Against Torture, which the United States has signed, prohibits the transfer of a detainee "to another state where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture".

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

34 human-written examples

In the past, even when the jurisdictional grant has been couched in language giving substantial ground for the argument of restriction of jurisdiction to the state court, this Court has not found denial by a State of the right to go to a federal court within that State when it in fact opened the door of its own courts.

Cornell University

Under a federal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), the judge must determine that the decision allowing the case to proceed "involves a controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate appeal from the order may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation".

The New York Times

The cautious thing for the American planners to do is assume a substantial ground presence for several more years.

The Guardian

substantial grounds have been shown for believing that the person, if returned to his or her country of origin or country of former habitual residence, would face a real risk of being subjected to serious harm, and he or she is unable, or owing to such risk, unwilling to avail him or herself of the protection of that country.

Columbia University

As for ISIL, there are substantial grounds to credit the proposition that ISIL's development and sustenance could not have been possible without tangible assistance from Ankara.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "substantial grounds for", ensure that you can clearly articulate and support the reasons with evidence or logical arguments. Avoid vagueness to maintain credibility.

Common error

Avoid using "substantial grounds for" when the evidence is weak or speculative. Overstating the strength of the basis can undermine your argument and reduce its persuasive impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "substantial grounds for" functions as a prepositional phrase that introduces the reason or justification for a claim, action, or belief. As Ludwig AI confirms, the usage in contexts like legal and formal arguments demonstrates its role in providing a solid basis.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

73%

Formal & Business

10%

Science

7%

Less common in

Academia

4%

Wiki

4%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "substantial grounds for" is a versatile expression used to introduce significant justifications or reasons in various contexts. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and common usage, particularly in news, formal business, and scientific domains. The analysis reveals that the phrase serves to provide solid rationales, support claims, or explain decisions effectively. While generally neutral to formal, the register can adapt based on the source material. By providing a clear and evidence-backed justification, writers can use "substantial grounds for" to reinforce arguments and maintain credibility, while avoiding overstatements of the reasons' weight.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

valid grounds for

Highlights the legitimacy of the reason.

significant basis for

Emphasizes the importance of the foundation or reason.

considerable justification for

Highlights the extent to which the reason is defended or supported.

adequate justification for

Suggests the reason meets a minimum requirement for acceptance.

ample reason for

Focuses on the abundance of justification.

sufficient cause for

Implies the reason is enough to warrant the action or belief.

sound argument for

Highlights the logical validity of the reasoning.

compelling cause for

Stresses the urgency or necessity of the reason.

material basis for

Focuses on the factual or tangible nature of the grounds.

legitimate rationale for

Focuses on the acceptability and validity of the explanation.

FAQs

How can I use "substantial grounds for" in a sentence?

You can use "substantial grounds for" to introduce a significant justification or reason for a particular action, belief, or decision. For example, "There are "substantial grounds for" believing that further investigation is warranted."

What are some alternatives to "substantial grounds for"?

Alternatives include phrases like "significant basis for", "valid reasons for", or "compelling cause for" depending on the specific context and emphasis you want to convey.

When is it appropriate to use "substantial grounds for"?

It's appropriate when you have a solid, well-supported reason that justifies a particular course of action or belief. It's often used in legal, formal, or professional contexts where clear justification is important.

Is "substantial grounds for" stronger than "some grounds for"?

Yes, ""substantial grounds for"" implies a stronger, more significant justification than "some grounds for". It suggests the reasons are considerable and carry weight.