substantial evidence of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "substantial evidence of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing proof or support for a claim, argument, or theory, particularly in legal, scientific, or academic writing. Example: "The researchers presented substantial evidence of climate change impacts on local ecosystems."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

We find no substantial evidence of male-female differences.

Cornell University

We also found substantial evidence of heterogeneity between the studies.

European Journal of Cancer

Moreover, the panel said, "there was other substantial evidence of Harvey's guilt".

The New York Times

"There is substantial evidence of serious police misconduct," said the Innocence Project's executive director, Nina Morrison.

The New York Times

Environmental activists were incensed Wednesday, saying that Pruitt had ignored substantial evidence of potential harms.

The Washington Post

And there has been substantial evidence of previous regime use of chemical weapons.

The Guardian

We found substantial evidence of social influence driving gift giving behavior," says Eckles.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

"There is substantial evidence of various connections between genes, brain, hormones and sexual identity," he said.

The New York Times

There was substantial evidence of wage and hour violations, the study concluded.

The New York Times

But the Afghan officials say they have substantial evidence of American involvement.

The New York Times

Our findings are highly encouraging, providing substantial evidence of the safety of PLGA@QT NPs for biomedical application.

Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "substantial evidence of", ensure the evidence is credible and verifiable to support your claim effectively.

Common error

Avoid using "substantial evidence of" when the evidence is weak or circumstantial. Using stronger language than warranted can undermine your credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "substantial evidence of" functions as a determiner phrase followed by a prepositional phrase. It modifies a noun to indicate that there is a significant amount of proof or support for something, as supported by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

38%

Academia

14%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "substantial evidence of" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to denote a significant amount of proof or support for a claim. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. It is most commonly found in news, scientific, and academic contexts, highlighting its use in formal and objective communication. While alternatives like "significant proof of" or "considerable indication of" exist, "substantial evidence of" remains a strong and direct way to convey the credibility and strength of supporting information. When using the phrase, make sure the evidence presented is indeed credible to maintain your own reliability and avoid misleading statements.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

significant proof of

Replaces "evidence" with "proof" and "substantial" with "significant", indicating a strong and convincing demonstration of something.

considerable indication of

Substitutes "evidence" with "indication" and "substantial" with "considerable", suggesting a notable sign or hint of something.

ample demonstration of

Replaces "evidence" with "demonstration" and "substantial" with "ample", emphasizing a clear and plentiful display of something.

strong confirmation of

Substitutes "evidence" with "confirmation" and "substantial" with "strong", highlighting a powerful validation of something.

compelling grounds for

Replaces "evidence" with "grounds" and "substantial" with "compelling", suggesting a convincing basis or reason for something.

marked signs of

Replaces "evidence" with "signs" and "substantial" with "marked", indicating noticeable indicators of something.

notable indicators of

Replaces "evidence" with "indicators" and "substantial" with "notable", suggesting important points that reveal something.

clear pointers to

Replaces "evidence" with "pointers" and "substantial" with "clear", suggesting direct clues about something.

solid justification for

Replaces "evidence" with "justification" and "substantial" with "solid", emphasizing a sound rationale for something.

cogent reasons for

Replaces "evidence" with "reasons" and "substantial" with "cogent", highlighting persuasive and well-reasoned support for something.

FAQs

How can I use "substantial evidence of" in a sentence?

"Substantial evidence of" is used to indicate that there is a significant amount of proof or support for a particular claim or idea. For example, "The report provides "substantial evidence of" the company's financial mismanagement".

What are some alternatives to saying "substantial evidence of"?

Alternatives to "substantial evidence of" include "significant proof of", "considerable indication of", or "ample demonstration of", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "substantial evidence for" or "substantial evidence of"?

"Substantial evidence of" is generally preferred because it directly connects the evidence to the thing it supports. "Substantial evidence for" can also be used, but it implies that the evidence is in favor of something. Therefore, "substantial evidence of" is usually the better choice.

What distinguishes "substantial evidence of" from "some evidence of"?

"Substantial evidence of" implies a significant amount of convincing proof, while "some evidence of" suggests only a minimal amount of support. The former is more persuasive and indicates a stronger basis for a claim.