Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

substantial evidence

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"substantial evidence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that has a significant amount of supportive proof or facts. For example: "The attorney presented substantial evidence to support his client's innocence."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Speculation isn't substantial evidence.

Falsified evidence isn't substantial evidence.

unsupported by substantial evidence on the record.

There is substantial evidence that jobs are lost.

Other accusations, some said, were not supported by substantial evidence.

News & Media

The New York Times

We find no substantial evidence of male-female differences.

Professor Behe's assertion constitutes substantial evidence that in his view..

Substantial evidence implicates intrauterine infection and/or inflammation in PTB.

We also found substantial evidence of heterogeneity between the studies.

Substantial evidence indicates that EGb 761 has neuroprotective effects.

Substantial evidence suggests that chromosomal abnormalities contribute to autism risk.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "substantial evidence", ensure that the evidence is directly relevant and clearly supports your claim or argument. Avoid vague or circumstantial evidence that only weakly connects to your central point.

Common error

Avoid describing evidence as "substantial" if it is based on limited data or questionable sources. Exaggerating the strength of evidence can undermine your credibility.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The primary grammatical function of "substantial evidence" is to act as a noun phrase, typically serving as the object of a verb or preposition. It denotes a significant amount of proof used to support a claim. Ludwig AI validates its correctness and common usage across diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Science

33%

Academia

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "substantial evidence" is a grammatically sound and frequently used noun phrase, indicating a significant amount of proof to support a claim. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage and wide acceptance. It appears most commonly in News & Media, Science, and Academic contexts, suggesting its role in objective and well-supported communication. While alternatives such as "significant proof" or "compelling justification" exist, "substantial evidence" effectively conveys the weight and importance of the supporting information. Ensure the evidence is directly relevant and clearly supports your argument when using the phrase, avoiding exaggeration of its strength.

FAQs

How can I use "substantial evidence" in a sentence?

You can use "substantial evidence" to indicate that there is a significant amount of proof or facts supporting a claim. For example, "The prosecution presented "substantial evidence" linking the defendant to the crime."

What are some alternatives to saying "substantial evidence"?

Alternatives to "substantial evidence" include "significant proof", "considerable validation", or "strong indication", depending on the specific context.

What distinguishes "substantial evidence" from simply "evidence"?

"Substantial evidence" implies a greater weight and volume of evidence, suggesting it is convincing and significant. "Evidence" alone is a broader term that includes all types of supporting information, regardless of strength or amount.

Is it correct to use "substantial evidences"?

No, the correct form is "substantial evidence". "Evidence" is generally used as an uncountable noun, so it does not have a plural form.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: