substantial concurrence

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "substantial concurrence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where agreement or alignment on a significant level is being discussed, such as in legal, academic, or formal discussions. Example: "The committee reached a substantial concurrence on the proposed policy changes, indicating strong support from all members."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Finding in all three sites substantial concurrence between the AFR approach and the 'local' values, we proceeded to set up a context-adaptive continuous action research approach.

Health Research Policy and Systems

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Put otherwise, the kind of unity that accrues to a thing on account of its being a mere singular, results from the concurrence of the "substantial" unity provided by matter and the "accidental" unity provided by quantity.

SEP

Conclusions: The presence of GERD and laryngeal symptoms, and their concurrence, was identified in a substantial number of subjects.

Journal of Voice

"The substantial risk of putting an innocent man to death," Justice Stevens wrote in a concurrence joined by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer, "clearly provides an adequate justification for holding an evidentiary hearing".

The New York Times

"Given the substantial detail buttressing the company's assertions, the continued deterioration in natural gas price forecasts, and the concurrence of many equity analysts, we believe the strategic rationale for the sale is credible," I.S.S. wrote in its report.

The New York Times

That was the concurrence.

The New York Times

A creepy concurrence.

The Economist

Justice Breyer also wrote a separate concurrence.

The New York Times

This concurrence was bound to happen.

The Guardian - Opinion

Justices Antonin Scalia and Samuel A. Alito Jr. joined Justice Breyer's concurrence.

The New York Times

She said that "everything had his concurrence".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "substantial concurrence" in formal writing when you want to emphasize a significant level of agreement or alignment. This phrase is suitable for reports, academic papers, and legal documents where precision and formality are important.

Common error

Avoid using "substantial concurrence" in casual conversations or informal writing. Simpler alternatives like "strong agreement" or "significant overlap" are more appropriate in those settings.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "substantial concurrence" functions as a noun phrase that signifies a considerable degree of agreement or alignment. This phrase is typically used in formal settings to describe a noteworthy convergence of opinions, findings, or results. As indicated by Ludwig, the phrase is grammatically correct and suitable for precise communication.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

33%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "substantial concurrence" is a grammatically correct and formally appropriate term used to describe a significant level of agreement or alignment. While not frequently encountered, its use is most suitable in academic, scientific, and professional contexts where precision is paramount. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase's grammatical correctness and highlights examples from reputable sources, reinforcing its validity for formal communication. When simpler language will not suffice, "substantial concurrence" offers a precise and authoritative way to express considerable agreement.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

significant agreement

Emphasizes the importance or scale of the agreement.

considerable accord

Highlights the extent of agreement, suggesting a notable level of harmony.

marked consensus

Focuses on the noticeable presence of agreement among a group.

significant overlap

Shifts the focus to the degree to which ideas or positions share common ground.

substantial overlap

Highlights that common elements are significant and important

notable convergence

Indicates that different things are moving toward the same point or conclusion.

strong consistency

Emphasizes the reliability and uniformity of agreement.

close correspondence

Suggests a high degree of similarity or alignment between two or more things.

material alignment

Focuses on the practical and important aspects of the agreement.

appreciable similarity

Indicates that the similarity is large enough to be noticed or considered important.

FAQs

How to use "substantial concurrence" in a sentence?

"Substantial concurrence" is used to describe a significant level of agreement or alignment. For example: "The committee reached a "substantial concurrence" on the proposed policy changes.".

What can I say instead of "substantial concurrence"?

You can use alternatives like "significant agreement", "considerable accord", or "marked consensus" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "substantial concurrence" or "substantial agreement"?

Both "substantial concurrence" and "substantial agreement" are correct, but they have slightly different nuances. "Substantial concurrence" implies more of a convergence of opinions or findings, while "substantial agreement" emphasizes a shared understanding or acceptance.

What's the difference between "substantial concurrence" and "minor concurrence"?

"Substantial concurrence" indicates a significant level of agreement or overlap, whereas "minor concurrence" suggests only a small or insignificant amount of agreement. The choice depends on the degree of alignment you want to convey.